Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
| Category: | Bags, Cases and Straps |
| Rating: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Price: | £230.00 |
Billingham 307 - Matt Grayson gives his camera a taste of the high life with the Billingham 307 camera bag.
- Width: 360mm
- Depth: 180mm
- Height: 260mm
- Width: 340mm
- Depth: 150mm
- Height: 220mm
- Width: 140mm
- Depth: 65mm
- Height: 200mm
- Strap length: 115-163mm
- Weight: 2Kg
- Material: FibreNyte canvas
The lugs that attach the strap are solid brass. A prime example of the quality.
|
The front pockets don't seem to be as protected as the interior or the rear pocket.
|
Billingham 307: Plus points
Lovely design
Strong materials
Deep main compartment
Spongy rubber on shoulder strapBillingham 307: Minus points
Stacking items means rummaging
Front pockets don't seem as protected
FEATURES
BUILD QUALITY

OVERALL

The Billingham 307 costs around £230 from Warehouse Express. Take a look here:
Billingham 307
Buy Now
Explore More
Comments
I have a billingham, which sadly I have discarded to the bottom of my cupboard. Why?
1. The bag, although, bought only two years ago, is not well suited to digital cameras, The DSLR is chunkier and heavier and so are the lenses.
2. There are no good webbed compartments to put those little things like spare battery, or a compartment for memory cards.
3. Lens brushes and cloths swivel around and often get lost.
But what really made me replace the otherwise stylish, rugged and well made Billingham, for Lowepro slingback is the weight distribution over the shoulder.
As I said Pro DSLRs are heavy and so are the lenses and they really dig into the shoulder due to the poor weight distribution of the system.
Billingham need to rethink their design, without loosing the quality and characteristics of the Billingham bags
I have a Billingham 225 which is ideally sized to carry a couple of 35mm rangefinder bodies, three or four lenses, a flash unit and a spot meter. I would disagree with the comment above regarding weight. Leica equipment is possibly weightier that digital equipment and the bag carries really well. If I am taking pictures in the hills I put my camera in a climbing sac as I don't believe that there is a camera bag made that fits all needs. But whether you are walking around town or working on the front line in Hellmund province a Billingham bag will not let you down
I’ve owned a number of outfit bags over the past 30 years or so - some really rubbish ones (quite a few) and some good ones (a very few). I have to say that the 307 for what it is and is designed to do, is without a doubt at the top of the pile. The only near contender among the shoulder bags I’ve owned was an old Domke F-2 (now used by my son) – nowhere near as weather resistant, protective, or as well made as the Billingham – but it did look good and performed well.
My D300 with battery grip and Nikkor 18-200mm F4/5.6 attached, fits easily into the 307 along with a Sigma 10-20mm, a Nikkor 18-35mm, a Nikkor 50mm and an SB800 flash. Everything is easily accessible - nothing is stored under anything else and nothing needs to be dismantled to fit in (unlike some “big name” messenger bags I’ve tried)! In my experience the front pockets don’t allow water ingress – even in the heaviest downpour – ok, they’re not padded, but they do hold all the odd “bitsnbobs” that we photographers accumulate and don’t need a cosy padded holder for – remote release, lens cleaning kit, spare card holder, notebook, exposed rolls of 120 Tri-X etc. (well, maybe not the Tri-X!)
I too use a backpack, LowePro Computrek, when hiking, and a Pelican 1510 for storage and air travel - makes a damn good seat in the queues!
Two phrases spring to mind about the Billingham (and for that matter all camera bags) – horses for courses – and - you get what you pay for.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.




Add Comment
Jargon Buster: Off

















