Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Canon's SED technology could kill off LCD monitors

Canon's SED technology could kill off LCD monitors - Canon's SED technology provides higher contrast and resolution than both LCD and traditional CRT displays.

 Add Comment

Category : Technology
Share :

A comparison of CRT and SED technology
Canon's SED technology could kill off LCD monitors
Canon and Toshiba have teamed up to produce this new flat-screen technology which will be superior to current displays available today. The three main improvements are:
  • Response time - slower response times found on LCD displays can lead to ghosting.
  • Contrast ratio - reported to be 100.000:1, the best LCDs currently only have a contrast ratio of 1000:1.
  • Viewing angle - up to 180, LCD screens can appear dark if they are not viewed straight-on.
SED (Surface-conduction Emission Display) works by using a thin film of Palladium Oxide as an electron emitter which strike a layer of phosphor, just like in a traditional CRT screen. Electrons are emitted at each sub-pixel, and so higher resolution and contrast is achievable. None of the problems associated with LCD screens should affect this technology either because phosphors are illuminated instead of using a backlit display as found in LCDs.

The greater clarity of these new displays will be ideal for photographers and graphic artists, for whom colour accuracy is critical.

Canon hope to be able to market this innovation in the form of televisions by winter 2007. Canon have refused to comment on when this technology will be available for computer monitors, only saying, "There are plans for production, but no details of (SED) monitors can be released at this time."
View Directory Page : Canon (UK) Ltd

Explore More

Join ePHOTOzine and remove these ads.

Comments


11 Apr 2006 7:02AM
Can't wait!

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
11 Apr 2006 7:43AM
Gimme gimme!!
mdpontin 10 6.0k Scotland
11 Apr 2006 8:52AM
Perfectly happy with my TFTs
PaulG 9 63 New Zealand
11 Apr 2006 9:14AM
Looks like a better option than Plasma or LCD... bit of a wait though.
joecool 9 350 United States
11 Apr 2006 7:11PM
Isn't it funny how eager people get? Just yesterday we've got LCD and Plasma and tomorrow we're crying for SED we don't even know...

cry then... or free yourself from attachment
27 Apr 2006 4:44AM
Two to three decades back any new technology was allowed to mature and would last a decade. The way new technology is being adopted we will not have any one maturing and we would have to abandon it before we can reap the rewards. The consumer is surely the looser since the develpment cost is also paid by the consumer. Those who boought the LCD recently thinking that now is the time as most of the teething problems are sorted are in for a surprise when they find out it is already obsolete.
PeteBailey 11 14 United Kingdom
27 Apr 2006 7:44AM
It's called progress, and leads to economic growth, with a side-effect of wastful obsolescence. Like PCs, if you always waited for the 'best' one, you would never get one, as the next best one is always just around the corner. Electronic goods have generally such a long real lifespan that if everyone stuck to what they had until it broke, and nobody or few bought the new stuff, then the eletronics companies would go out of business.They depend on people buying the new stuff for their income, not only to produce the current goods, but to research and develop the newer goods. And so it goes on, and on..
27 Apr 2006 10:01AM
Nice. But there's other stuff like this in the labs. Every now and then some news leaks as one technology or another achieves some milestone, gets closer to commerciality, or simply gets a journo's interest. Stuff like spindt cathodes. Its all good stuff, who knows which will be the winner(s) and for how long? Personally, I still think OLEP/P-OLED/PLED (the acronym seems to change) is a winner (check out Cambridge Display Technology; its listed in New York under the ticker OLED). And it is already in use in some products - some digicams and some mobile phones; its mainly a question of getting it bigger.
27 Apr 2006 1:33PM
Nice. But there's other stuff like this in the labs. Every now and then some news leaks as one technology or another achieves some milestone, gets closer to commerciality, or simply gets a journo's interest. Stuff like spindt cathodes. Its all good stuff, who knows which will be the winner(s) and for how long? Personally, I still think OLEP/P-OLED/PLED (the acronym seems to change) is a winner (check out Cambridge Display Technology; its listed in New York under the ticker OLED). And it is already in use in some products - some digicams and some mobile phones; its mainly a question of getting it bigger.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.