Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
| Category: | Compact Cameras |
| Rating: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Price: | £279.00 |
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR - Matt Grayson takes a look at a camera that under exposes. But it also over exposes and puts them together.
- Zoom: 5x optical
- Resolution: 12Mp
- Sensor size: 1/1.6in
- Sensor type: CCD EXR
- Max. image size: 4000x3000
- File type: JPEG
- Sensitivity: ISO100-3200 (ISO6400 at 6Mp and ISO12,800 at 3Mp)
- Storage: SD, SDHC, xD picture card
- Focus types: Area, multi, centre
- Normal focusing: 45cm-infinity
- Close focusing: 5cm-80cm
- Metering types: Program AE, aperture-priority, manual
- Exposure compensation: +/- 2EV in 1/3 step increments
- Shutter speed: 8sec-1/1500sec
- Flash: Built-in
- Monitor: 3in TFT LCD
- Interface: USB 2.0
- Power: Li-Ion battery
- Size: 97.7x58.9x23.4mm
- Weight: 175g (excl. battery/card)
Fujifilm have always been avant garde about their sensors. They released the Super CCD in 1999 which, with octagonal pixels, was a mind blowing variant on the traditional rectangular design. Then over the course of a few years they improved on it releasing several generation versions as well as a high resolution model and one to help with high dynamic range.
HR mode is designed to make the best out of the resolution which will be best for macro work although with a close focusing of 5cm, this might be contradictory. The performance section will shed some light on it while the noise test area will be a great place to try out the SN mode which is designed to produce the best quality images in low light. The third option, DR, which helps with high contrast areas.
This third option is particularly interesting as Lisa Graham, Communications Co-ordinator for Fujifilm UK said: “It works by taking two photographs with one slightly under exposed and one slightly over exposed. It then merges them together to create a final image with an expanded dynamic range.”
Clever stuff indeed and it's certainly exciting news but could it spell the end of HDR photography? Well, HDR is designed for this very purpose, but it also has that kind of ethereal quality that can't be got from any other way of taking pictures. With the camera taking the control away from you it takes all the fun away but then the camera could be used by those who want the higher dynamic range.
Fujifilm haven't just limited the sensors capabilities to the EXR mode though, they've also tied it into the scene recognition system. This feature is now widely used in many compacts and will essentially see what you're taking a picture of and change the shooting mode to suit it. The F200 will now take it one step further and select the correct EXR mode to suit the scene being photographed.
It's a relatively large compact by today's standards but it's not unattractive. A large lens sits on the front which is necessary to house the 5x optical capability and is contradicted by a tiny flash sat in the top left corner.
Modes and buttons have been removed from the top plate and only the power button, shutter release and zoom are now found there. Everything is on the back down the right hand side of the large 3in LCD screen. A screen this size along with all those dials and buttons could explain the size of the camera.
A small mode dial accesses the areas most used on the camera such as the auto, manual and program modes as well as the natural, natural with flash and new EXR mode. Interestingly, the old FinePix button has been retained and still works in the same way as a function button on other cameras giving access to frequently used features such as ISO, image size, quality and film simulation. Film simulations are still pretty basic with only a colour, black & white and sepia types but the colour has now been reclassified to Provia. This is an idea that was championed on the Fujifilm FinePix S100fs with different Fuji film types and I think giving them a name is an easier reference. In manual mode the film simulations are expanded to include vivid (Velvia) and soft (Astia) film types.
![]() White balance appears to be better with the flash and it certainly hasn't bleached out the subject. I even chose a reflective item to really stick the boot in but it's coped admirably.
|
The F200 EXR also boasts the highest sensitivity of any compact with a maximum setting of ISO12800. This is only at 3Mp, but they have to control the noise that will be generated any way they can. Pixels get hot while they're being used and this creates a type of noise that affects neighbouring pixels. By reducing the resolution, this spaces out the pixels meaning they're less likely to affect others. I don't think it's a bad thing as a lot of pictures will look pretty good from a 3Mp resolution.
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR: Build and handling
Buttons are firm enough although a little on the small side considering the amount of space available. The dial rotates with solid clicks but can be a little tricky to move round sometimes which is annoying. The buttons are taken from a smaller model and it looks like the camera could have had about a centimetre chopped off the height if they were moved around a bit. Seeing as that hasn't happened, I don't see why they couldn't be made bigger. It probably boils down to cost with pre-made button moulds being cheaper than remaking larger versions just for this camera.
![]() |
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR: Performance
Shutter lag sits at the 0.08sec setting which is about standard for a compact and I'm starting to think that it's maybe as fast as it's going to get. Start up time from power up to being ready to shoot is around three seconds while actually focusing on a subject and taking a picture adds a further couple of seconds to the overall result.
In burst mode, the camera has several options. Top3 takes three photographs in quick succession and will be done in under a second and a half. Final3 does the same thing but instead of just taking three pictures and stopping, it keeps taking pictures but only holds the last three in its memory buffer. When you release the shutter, it records the final three that were taken. This is great if your reactions aren't all that good.
I'm really impressed with the colour test chart. Although primary blue is a little too saturated for my tastes, the warmer tones such as red and yellow are balanced while the earth brown and forest green are rich. There's more colour in the pastel tiles that run down the left side of brown, orange and blue than I've seen in a long time and the skin tone tile isn't too pink. It's a lovely result that should give some appealing and precisely coloured images.
I took four portrait images because there are a couple of modes I want to try on skin. In portrait mode, the skin isn't too warm and the white balance has coped with being outside in shade nicely. There's good detail in the hair and the skin tone is even. Another mode that the scene menu has is portrait enhancer. It's a feature that's been present on Fujifilm cameras for a while but it looks like they've been working on it. In my review of the Fujifilm FinePix F60fd back in December, I commented that the enhancer system was clever but not perfect. That's still the case but to a lesser degree.
It's the lesser of two evils as placing the flash nearer the lens would add to the possibility of red-eye. Small catch lights have been added and shadows have been filled nicely.
I shot the landscape test image on a decent day with a mixture of sun and clouds. The sun catching the white bars has thrown up some colour fringing but what is worse is that the landscape mode has chosen a sensitivity of ISO400. It means noise is poking through which isn't a good thing for landscapes and detail is being lost.
While I was there, I noticed the gates had been left open so i took the opportunity to take a shot down the length of the lock. I used the DR mode in the EXR menu to see if it worked any and it has brought out some more detail in the underside of the balance beam.
One thing I noticed was the image size on the DR image is 2816x1864 compared to the 4000x2664 of the image taken in program mode. It's nearly half the size dimensionally and it appeared to do this automatically. I asked Fujfilm the reaon behind this and they've yet to answer but I'll add it to the review as soon as they reply.
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR: Noise test
Noise is dealt with very well at low ISO which is the mark of good hardware and a larger sensor. It's not until ISO400 that it starts to become evident on the image but it then starts to deteriorate as the sensitivity increases.
By ISO1600 nearly all detail in the petals has disappeared and aggressive noise is invading all areas of the image. At ISO3200 colour noise is starting to break down the image to a point that makes it difficult to look at.
At ISO6400 the resolution drops to 6Mp and even though noise does increase, it does so at a steadier rate than if the resolution were doubled. Halving the resolution again allows you to choose ISO12800 which is pretty shocking but it's good that they've at least included it. They could've quite easily left it where it was but by adding this setting, it's pushed the benchmark up. In turn, other companies will copy and improve meaning better images at low light as technology progresses.
The ISO100 test.
|
The ISO3200 test.
|
The ISO6400 test.
|
![]() The ISO12800 test.
|
I can't help but feel that this sensor has been somewhat wasted on a compact? Some of you may disagree including any Fuji employees but I think that this technology would be untilised more by a keen photographer who uses a DSLR. It would be a good excuse to get another Fujifilm DSLR on the market too.
I wonder how Fujifilm will develop this film with the release of the Spheron VR camera that was showcased at Focus 2009. It's a long way off production on the same scale as Fuji cameras but the technology is evolving at an exciting rate.
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR: Plus points
Innovative sensor design
Large LCD screen
5x optical zoom
28mm wide lens
Advanced face detection
Wider sensitivity options up to ISO12,800Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR: Minus points
Larger camera
Slow at processing EXR images
EXR image size is smaller
Jargon needs busting
Noise comes in a bit too early
FEATURES
HANDLING

PERFORMANCE

OVERALL

For the new EXR sensor, I've awarded the Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR camera our fabled Cutting Edge award.
The Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR will cost around £279 and is available from Warehouse Express:
Fujifilm FinePix F200 EXR
Buy Online
- Fuji Premium Leather Case for F80EXR/F70EXR/F200EXR available from Wex Photographic for £19.95
- Fujifilm Finepix F200EXR Digital Camera - Black (12MP, 5x Optical Zoom) 3 inch LCD available from Amazon UK for
Explore More
Comments
I doubt this would benefit a DSLR but, a larger compact, say a rangefinder to compete with Epson, well that would be an interesting niche cam that would sell even in these difficult times!
mmm, an interesting idea. Of course I meant on a larger APS-C sensor (min). ![]()
The point of the exr sensor is to drop the resolution earlier than at 6400 iso. I would reccomend 800 iso. This is configurable. Most pocket cameras start to get noisy at 400 to 800 iso. Plus the question in everyone's mind is "is this camera better than the f20/f30 series fujifilm". Which is a 6mp camera. So doing everything at 6mp wouldn't be unreasonable.
That's true. With todays advancements in sensor technology, a lot of people argue that 6Mp is more than enough.
***REVIEW UPDATE***
I had a response from Fujifilm regarding the sensor automatically dropping to 6Mp using the DR setting in the EXR menu. They explained that when it takes the DR shot, it takes two images using half the resolution for each, one over exposed to get shadow detail and one under exposed to get the highlights. It then merges these results together in a similar fashion to a HDR program and retains the best bits from both shots. It doesn't use interpolation which is why it remains at 6Mp.
...and 6mp on a larger sensor, which can't be bad. I can't believe that they'll miss the chance to use it in a DSLR, though. However, even SLR users often want a 'good' compact to carry round so they always have a camera on them, and it is frustrating that most of them are so bad in low light. So, this might be an improvement...
Any chance of seeing samples of the other ISO settings, including the SN mode, as these are the settings most people will want to use (and compare) probably more than the extremes. I have also seen use of the DR setting in low light which was pretty interesting.
Thanks for your work in putting together the review.
...and 6mp on a larger sensor, which can't be bad. I can't believe that they'll miss the chance to use it in a DSLR, though. However, even SLR users often want a 'good' compact to carry round so they always have a camera on them, and it is frustrating that most of them are so bad in low light. So, this might be an improvement...
Any chance of seeing samples of the other ISO settings, including the SN mode, as these are the settings most people will want to use (and compare) probably more than the extremes. I have also seen use of the DR setting in low light which was pretty interesting.
Thanks for your work in putting together the review.
...and 6mp on a larger sensor, which can't be bad. I can't believe that they'll miss the chance to use it in a DSLR, though. However, even SLR users often want a 'good' compact to carry round so they always have a camera on them, and it is frustrating that most of them are so bad in low light. So, this might be an improvement...
Any chance of seeing samples of the other ISO settings, including the SN mode, as these are the settings most people will want to use (and compare) probably more than the extremes. I have also seen use of the DR setting in low light which was pretty interesting.
Thanks for your work in putting together the review.
Sorry, I did only click once...
Maybe a staff member could delete the excess posts.
At the risk of more phantom multiple postings...
I have suddenly realised why the DR mode produces much better low noise results than the so-called SN mode, which is ironically very poor at reducing noise in low light. It is because in DR two images are captured and averaged, ostensibly for higher dynamic range, but this has the beneficial side-effect of averaging out some of the noise, too. Brilliant. If they could take four frames simultaneously, noise would probably be negligible. You read it here first...
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.



Add Comment
Jargon Buster: Off































