Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
| Category: | Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera |
| Product: | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
| Price: | £709.99 |
Olympus OM-D E-M5 2-Month User Review - ePHOTOzine member, Brian Wadie gives us his impressions of using the Olympus OM-D E-M5 as a replacement for his Canon gear.
Add Comment
Jargon Buster: OffOlympus OM-D EM-5 User Review, brian1208 records his early impressions
- Olympus OM-D E-M5
- Olympus 12-50mm kit lens
- Olympus 75-300mm (used)
- Olympus 9-18mm
- Olympus 45mm f1.8
- Olympus FL36 flash gun (used)
Canon EOS 5D Mk2 + 17-55mm L IS + 24-105mm L IS + 100mm L IS macro + 70-300mm L IS = 3.8kg
Olympus OM-D EM-5 + 9-18mm + 12-50mm + 45mm f1.8 + 75-300mm = 1.24 kg
Which means that I can carry my entire Olympus rig in my Lowepro Nova 180 AW shoulder bag, without injuring my shoulders or neck after a days shooting. So far I am delighted with the results I am getting under a variety of shooting situations:
Macro: with the kit lens
4 sport chaser profile
Water sports: with the Olympus 75-300mm
Board gybing
Landscape: with the Olympus 9-18mm
Studio: with the kit lens
Colin with kit
Eye detail
Flowers: With the kit lens, 45mm f1.8 and 75-300mm
Gazzania
Wildlife & Nature: Using the Olympus 75-300mm
Fox stare
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Conclusion:
Read our full Olympus OM-D E-M5 review for full sample photos and ratings.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros:
LightweightWell made (some of the lenses are built like a watch)Comparatively small, even with the battery packEVF is excellent, clear and large enough to compose and manual focus withVery fast, accurate AF in SAF mode using center focus pointThe kit lens is excellent value, particularly for close-up & macro workA good range of lenses is availableThe ability to use 3rd party / legacy lenses via adapters is a bonusPrints from processed RAW images are close to the quality of those I got from my Canon system (tested up to 18"x12" so far)Olympus OM-D E-M5 Cons:
Menu system is not easy to useButtons are not nice to use, a bit "squidgy" and imprecise feelingContinuous AF and Focus Tracking are not well enacted, I've stopped using this for my workIt's not best suited to shooting Birds in Flight, particularly against light, bright skiesOlympus OM-D E-M5 Specifications
| Manufacturer | Olympus | |
| Image Sensor | ||
| CCD pixels | 16.1Mp (Megapixels) | |
| Pixels (W) | 4608 | |
| Pixels (H) | 3456 | |
| Sensor Type | Live MOS Sensor | |
| Sensor Size | Micro / Four Thirds | |
| Sensor Size (width) | 17.3mm | |
| Sensor Size (height) | 13mm | |
| Aspect Ratio |
|
|
| LCD Monitor | ||
| LCD Monitor | 3in | |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | |
| Touch Screen | Yes | |
| Focusing | ||
| Focusing modes |
|
|
| Exposure Control | ||
| Shutter speeds shortest | 1/4000sec | |
| Shutter speeds longest | 60sec | |
| Exp modes |
|
|
| Metering |
|
|
| ISO sensitivity | 200 - 25600 | |
| White balance |
|
|
| Exposure Comp | +/-3 | |
| Viewfinder | ||
| Viewfinder Resolution | 1.44million dots | |
| Shooting Options | ||
| Continuous shooting | 9fps | |
| Video | ||
| Movie mode | Yes | |
| Video Resolution |
|
|
| Video FPS | 30 | |
| Stereo Sound | Yes | |
| Optical Zoom with Video | Yes | |
| Other Features | ||
| Image Stabilisation | Yes | |
| Interface | ||
| HDMI | Yes | |
| USB | USB 2 | |
| Storage | ||
| Card Type |
|
|
| File Type |
|
|
| Power Source | ||
| Battery Type | Lithium Ion | |
| CIPA Rating | 330 | |
| Box Contents | ||
| Box Contents | Body, Flash FL-LM2, Li-ion battery BLN-1, Li-ion battery charger BCN-1, USB/Video Multi cable, Shoulder strap, OLYMPUS Viewer 2/ib CD-ROM, Instruction manual, Warranty card | |
| Dimensions | ||
| Weight | 373g | |
| Width | 121mm | |
| Height | 89.6mm | |
| Depth | 41.9mm | |
Buy Now
Explore More
Comments
Have been pondering an upgrade for a while, truth is though my photography has taken a bit of a back seat lately so muddling along with my 40D works well enough for the small amount I've been doing. If I did have a pressing need/desire to upgrade right now, this would def be on top of my list - for now though it's wait and see.
There's some great shots here, you've managed to achieve some really sharp stuff that so far I haven't been able to reproduce in my dabblings with my OM-D, I wonder what PP you've been doing, or whether I'm just still too much of an OM-D novice? It's interesting that you've come to many of the same conclusions I have (I have a 'first impressions' review over on the blog this week) but also that you've been using a 75-300 lens as well, something I will have to look into. I'm really looking forward to getting some legacy lenses on the camera and using the magnifier to get the best out of them. As a fellow Canon shooter I'm certainly glad of less weight...
Thanks for taking time to comment.
I think its cute (but ugly?) and I'm certainly not ashamed to be seen out with her in public 
In fact people are frequently wanting to know what it is and getting quite excited by the whole package
Saul, I'm shooting in RAW and processing in LR4, depending on the lens I use I need very lttle sharpening at all (45 f1.8 is so sharp that for portraits I often soften a bit by reducing the clarity slider).
With the 75-300 at 200 to 300mm I find I need a bit more sharpening but I'll put some butterfly / bee shots up in my PF later which confirm a suspicion I've had for some time - namely the more I use this camera the better its getting at taking sharp images 
With the legacy lenses, I suggest you get ones with a built in manual iris as otherwise you end up using them wide open (unless you go the 4/3rds route)
I am also a former canon user traded in all my kit for an omd plus panny 45-200 and a sigma 19 I can now fit all my kit in a low pro 100 sling bag and have more than enough space for battery's and filters the best bit is I can go out all day with all my kit and not feel like I have been on an assault course . I share your views on the caf and also use safe to track moving subject only had the camera for two weeks but I am very pleased with it I also have an epl1 and this triggered my interest in csc
I've had the chance to do some fairly intensive trial of action shooting and thought I would update my review accordingly.
These included a child trampolining, a dog trying to catch a ball and a Wakeboarder in the throes of a major wipeout.
The child and dog were shot using the Olympus 9-18mm and the Wakeboarder using the Olympus 75-300mm.
I found that using 6fps in SAF mode with IS1 or IS2 allowed me to track the action and keep focus on the subject for around 70% - 80% of the the frames.
I'm very impressed with this performance which is up there with what I was achieving with my canon 7D + L lenses
You can see a small collection of images from these shoots (all hand-held) here
action
Thanks for dropping by Mark, I hope all is well with you.
I look forward to reading your review when it comes out (can you say where it will be published?), it will be interesting to get a pro's view on how this little thing performs, it will give me a chance to see what else it can do 
Brian, excellent pictures and good honest review, but there doesn't seem to be that famous Olympus colour signature we have all grown to love. Yes, it shows very good colour but its not quite the same.
I have handled an E-M5 and to be honest, its not as nice to hold as a DSLR or the Panny G5, i guess this is the price paid for going retro with OM styling.
Olympus need to bring out a budget version which would possibly bring it into my price range, if they do that then the Panny G5 must be a serious alternative.
Great camera though, shame about the price.
Thanks Peter, I don't have experience of the "famous Olympus colour signature" as this is my first Olympus but to my eyes there is a difference between the EM5 colour and that of the canon system I am more used to. If anything I would judge the colours I am seeing on the Olympus as more natural (less rich) than the canon colour palette.
One other thought is that I am still learning how to post-process my RAW files and maybe am not showing the Olympus colours at their best?
Brian
The older Olympus colours when they used a Panasonic sensor were liked very much by Oly users and especially in Jpeg. The palette was punchy but always retained the lesser more subtle hues without going over the top and shots of landscapes were always lovely. Olympus deservidly earned their excellent colour signature reputation from mostly landscapes.
Ironically, the Panasonic G series cameras using the same or similar sensor as the Oly were a tad more neutral if not a slightly cooler palette than Olympus, colours looked 'flatter'. Its been heavily rumoured that the E-M5 uses a Sony sensor, but no body has ever confirmed or denied it.
However, the colours from the E-M5 are superb but not quite as 'warm' as the old Oly palette.
The older Oly sensors were so good in Jpeg mode that very little more detail could be gained using RAW making it almost reduntant for those not bothered to do loads of PP.
I agree with your comments on the Canon, but then all manufacturers to one degree or another over emphasise the colour palette to make the pictures more attractive to Mr average.
Once again, great pictures, excellent review and a nice camera, but not for me.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
