Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Sony Alpha 7R Vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 Comparison

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Category: Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera
Product: Sony Alpha 7R

Sony Alpha 7R Vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 - We take a look at two of the most important mirrorless cameras announced in the last couple of years, the full-frame Sony Alpha 7R and the Olympus OM-D E-M5.

Posted:
Print Article Add Comment Add CommentJargon Buster: Off Jargon Buster: Off
Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (1) (Custom)

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 shook up the mirrorless and Digital SLR market when it was introduced last year in 2012, with a classic SLR styling, combined with the Micro Four Thirds system, and a Sony sensor, it set a new benchmark in the level of image quality possible from such a compact mirrorless camera. 

The design and built in electronic viewfinder, along with weather sealed body, made it an appealing option for many meaning they did not have to carry their large DSLR camera with them. Since then, nothing has really come close to shaking up the camera market so much, until this week, when Sony introduced the full-frame Sony Alpha 7 and 7R mirrorless cameras. 

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (2) (Custom)


Both of the new Sonys features a rather striking resemblance to the Olympus OM-D E-M5, so we thought it would be interesting to look at them side by side. The Sony Alpha 7 and 7R also feature a weather sealed body, built in electronic viewfinder, tilting rear screen, and similar classical SLR styling with a very angular pyramid viewfinder on the top. 

Sony Alpha 7 (22) (Custom)
The Carl Zeiss 24-70mm lens mounted on the Sony Alpha 7.

Due to the large full-frame sensor on the Sony Alpha 7 and 7R - the lenses are likely to be larger than Micro Four Thirds lenses. However should still offer a much more compact solution than traditional full-frame Digital SLRs, which are larger by nature when compared to mirrorless cameras, due to the mirror and optical viewfinder system.

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (8) (Custom)

The Sony Alpha 7 (and 7R) will need a new Sony FE Mount lens to take advantage of the full frame sensor, with a 24 megapixel sensor in the A7, and a 36 megapixel sensor in the A7R.

Sony Alpha FE Mount Lenses Carl Zeiss 35mm 55mm 24 70 28 70 (1)
Sony Alpha FE-Mount Lenses: Carl Zeiss 35mm, 55mm, 24-70mm, and 28-70mm.

Sony has announced 5 new lenses for the Sony FE-Mount, with the first lens, the Carl Zeiss 35mm f/2.8, released November 2013 at the same time as the cameras, and Carl Zeiss SEL55mm f/1.8 and Carl Zeiss SEL24-70mm f/4 Z released January 2014. The following two lenses, the Sony SEL28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS and Sony SEL70-200mm f/4 OSS G, from Spring 2014. Carl Zeiss has also announced plans to release additional lenses in 2014.

Sony Alpha 7 (24) (Custom)

Using current Sony NEX E-Mount lenses will result in a cropped photo or heavy vignetting. You can use a Sony Alpha A-Mount lens with an adapter, shown above left, which will allow auto-focus, or alternatively, like the Micro Four Thirds system, there are a number of adapters available to allow the use of full-frame lenses from other manufacturers such as Leica, Nikon, Canon, etc, although most of them will require manual operation (depending on the adapter). With the added weight of the adapter, and the potential size of full-frame lenses, the optional battery grip will be advisable for those that would like to have something else to hold on to, to make the camera feel more balanced.

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (7) (Custom)

With the Olympus OM-D E-M5, image stabilisation is built in with an impressive 5-axis image stabilisation, that works in video mode as well. The Sony Alpha 7 and 7R instead uses optical image stabilisation that is lens based, so you will need to ensure your lens features optical IS if you require it.

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (4) (Custom)

The rear of both cameras features a 3 inch tilting screen, however the Olympus OM-D E-M5 has a touch screen, making setting the focus point very easy. The Sony screen tilts further for shooting with the camera low down.

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (5) (Custom)

Both cameras feature front and rear control dials for aperture and shutter settings, or other changes, to settings, however the Sony Alpha 7 and 7R feature an exposure compensation dial. 

The Sony Alpha 7/7R has a noticeably larger hand grip when compared to the Olympus OM-D E-M5, with the E-M5 having the option of a two part battery grip, or alternatively you could consider the newer Olympus OM-D E-M1, which has a significantly larger grip, and a more Digital SLR styled body.

Sony Alpha A7 A7R Vs Olympus OMD E M5 (3) (Custom)

Both cameras are weather sealed, and give side access to the memory card slot, with the battery compartment underneath. It will be interesting to see how the new full-frame mirrorless cameras perform when they are available, and whether Sony will gain further market share from Nikon and Canon (and others?) as a result. Until we have full production versions in for review, feel free to have a look at our hands-on reviews with sample photos below:

Read our Sony Alpha 7 Hands-on Review with Sample Photos
Read our Sony Alpha 7R Hands-On Review with Sample Photos
Read our Olympus OM-D E-M5 Review


Comparison Table

Sony Alpha 7R Olympus OM-D E-M5
ManufacturerSonyOlympus
Image Sensor
CCD pixels 36.4Mp (Megapixels)16.1Mp (Megapixels)
Pixels (W) 73604608
Pixels (H) 49123456
Sensor Type Exmor CMOSLive MOS Sensor
Sensor Size Full-FrameMicro / Four Thirds
Sensor Size (width) 35.9mm17.3mm
Sensor Size (height) 24mm13mm
Aspect Ratio
  • 3:2
  • 4:3
  • 3:2
  • 16:9
  • 1:1
LCD Monitor
LCD Monitor 3in3in
Screen resolution 921k dots610k dots
Touch Screen NoYes
Focusing
Focusing modes
  • Autofocus
  • Manual
  • Spot
  • Face Detection
  • Multi
  • Centre
  • Autofocus
  • Manual
  • Face Detection
  • AF Tracking
  • Touch AF
  • Spot
  • Multi
Exposure Control
Shutter speeds shortest 1/8000sec1/4000sec
Shutter speeds longest 30sec60sec
Exp modes
  • Program
  • Aperture-Priority
  • Shutter-Priority
  • Manual
  • Scene modes
  • Program Variable
  • Program
  • Aperture-Priority
  • Shutter-Priority
  • Manual
  • Scene modes
Metering
  • Centre-weighted - Average
  • Multi Pattern
  • Spot
  • Centre-weighted - Average
  • Multi Pattern
  • Spot
ISO sensitivity 100 - 25600200 - 25600
White balance
  • Auto
  • Manual
  • Bracket
  • Outdoors/Daylight
  • Cloudy
  • Incandescent
  • Fluorescent
  • Shade
  • Underwater
  • Auto
  • Manual
  • Incandescent
  • Fluorescent
  • Outdoors/Daylight
  • Cloudy
  • Shade
  • Flash
  • Underwater
Exposure Comp +/-3+/-3
Viewfinder
Viewfinder Resolution 2,359,296 dots1.44million dots
Shooting Options
Continuous shooting 4fps9fps
Video
Movie mode YesYes
Video Resolution
  • 1920x1080
  • 640x480 VGA
  • 1440x1080
  • 1920x1080
  • 1280x720 720p
  • 640x480 VGA
Video FPS 60p, 25p30
Stereo Sound YesYes
Optical Zoom with Video YesYes
Other Features
Image Stabilisation NoYes
Interface
HDMI YesYes
USB USB 2USB 2
Storage
Card Type
  • SD
  • SDHC
  • Memory Stick
  • SDXC
  • SD
  • SDHC
  • SDXC
File Type
  • RAW
  • JPG
  • RAW + JPG
  • RAW
  • JPG
  • RAW + JPG
Power Source
Battery Type Lithium-IonLithium Ion
CIPA Rating 270330
Box Contents
Box Contents No DataBody, Flash FL-LM2, Li-ion battery BLN-1, Li-ion battery charger BCN-1, USB/Video Multi cable, Shoulder strap, OLYMPUS Viewer 2/ib CD-ROM, Instruction manual, Warranty card
Dimensions
Weight 407g373g
Width 126.9mm121mm
Height 94.4mm89.6mm
Depth 48.2mm41.9mm
View Full DetailsView Full Details

Explore More

Kodak Pixpro S1 Micro Four Thirds Camera Hands-On Preview

Kodak Pixpro S1 Hands-On Preview

Gary Wolsteholme goes hands on with the new Kodak Pixpro S1,...

Sony Alpha ILCE-5000 Full Review

Sony Alpha A5000 Full Review

We review the new Sony Alpha A5000, the compact mirrorless c...

Panasonic Lumix GH4 Hands-On Preview

Panasonic Lumix GH4 Hands-On Preview

We go hands-on with the new Panasonic Lumix GH4, and see wha...

Join ePHOTOzine and remove these ads.

Comments

joglos
joglos  1 United Kingdom
21 Oct 2013 - 1:50 PM

Sorry but surely it would have made more sense to compare the Sony's with the Olympus E-M1 !! rather than with a now secondary camera

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
21 Oct 2013 - 2:50 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

ChrisV
ChrisV  7663 forum posts United Kingdom26 Constructive Critique Points
21 Oct 2013 - 2:50 PM

If you're the sort of photographer who only ever uses short zooms or compact primes I can see this being attractive. But I can't help thinking that's quite a small niche market. Once you start adding larger primes/telephotos/longer zooms, having a compact body seems a little redundant.

I like the idea of smaller/lighter gear that offers quality. Unfortunately the 35mm format because of the necessary size of optics just doesn't lend itself to that system wide. So it's unfortunately a pretty flawed concept.

CAMMYrah
CAMMYrah  4 United Kingdom
23 Oct 2013 - 12:02 PM

Interesting new kit but, after trawling around the web and checking on Sony's site, it appears that there is no built-in image stabilisation on the A7/A7R, which seems surprising on a new Sony camera. The resolution of the rear screen quoted on Sony's site is the same as your figure, but WEX have it down as 1.23million, so it's worth double-checking any stats, as always - again, when considering recent releases, the higher figure might have been expected from Sony, perhaps.

jeanjosephchezmoi

I think we as consumers should welcome this photographic system development by Sony. I guess that it is a beginning and not an end so I anticipate further developments to this camera in due course. In the meantime there is a number of new Sony lenses getting ready for sale so the package will be significant.

I know that 'size matters' for some people and for those who it does then this brings some positive relief but the comparison here, a FF system with the Micro 4/3 system, though interesting, is a bit like comparing chalk and cheese.

I for one welcome the increased development of FF and its potential increased availability to more people. Of course the price is still high though lower than the Canikon competition but heading in the right direction. In conclusion I think Sony deserve credit for moving this forward.

Architron
Architron  2 Malaysia
23 Oct 2013 - 1:41 PM

So near & yet so far. I am Sony Fan since Sony camera started, & 7R has what I want; EXCEPT: 01- Image Stabilisation, 02- touch-screen. Why trim off these 2 important features?
An accompanying 18-100(150) zoom lens would be so friendly & practical.
Come on Sony, go for it!

LarryS
LarryS  1
23 Oct 2013 - 3:14 PM

article said:"due to the large full-frame sensor on the Sony Alpha 7 and 7R - the lenses are likely to be larger than Micro Four Thirds lenses." Lenses must be full size and weight to provide benefit of full size sensor.

"However should still offer a much more compact solution than traditional full-frame Digital SLRs, which are larger by nature when compared to mirrorless cameras, due to the mirror and optical viewfinder system." NOT SO. Result will be small camera with large lenses, not the most comfortable combination

kodachrome
23 Oct 2013 - 3:47 PM

Ok, there is no IBIS because all the Sony lenses have built in IS. I don't hear Canikon users complaining about no IBIS. The Sony wins for me purely on sensor size. After lugging a D90 around fore years with associated 'heavy' and large Nikon lenses, the Sony lenses are small and light by comparison. I think Sony have set a precedent.

JohnHoppy
JohnHoppy  5 United Kingdom
23 Oct 2013 - 6:20 PM

Interesting to a point. But really, the only thing these two have in common is that they belong to the new generation of Mirrorless cameras. The Olympus system has a huge number of far smaller lenses as its main attraction. Both can deliver the goods in terms of photographic potential and it's clear the FF Sony should have an IQ advantage. If you're going to compare potentials as TOOLS this article doesn't quite do it. Much more relevant would be a comparison of the Sony FF with CaNikon FF competitors. That should be the issue - SLR or SLM.

Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1214393 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
23 Oct 2013 - 8:09 PM

These two camera`s have a fair bit in common, but only one of these is mirrorless.

Both brands have succeeded in being different and moving away from the tried and tested route.

Last Modified By Paul Morgan at 23 Oct 2013 - 8:11 PM
richshep
richshep  11 United Kingdom
23 Oct 2013 - 10:49 PM


Quote: These two camera`s have a fair bit in common, but only one of these is mirrorless.

Both brands have succeeded in being different and moving away from the tried and tested route.

Is this a joke? If it is I don't get it.
Oh hang on. It's not a joke. I just didn't understand your remark. Now I do. I think...

Last Modified By richshep at 23 Oct 2013 - 10:55 PM
richshep
richshep  11 United Kingdom
23 Oct 2013 - 11:04 PM

The daftest thing about these cameras - one of them anyhow - is the megapixel count. Why does anyone need 36 mp to look at a picture on a computer screen - or even print up to A0? Waste of hard drive space if you ask me.

kodachrome
24 Oct 2013 - 9:11 AM

I suspect richshep has a point, most people are content to look at their pictures on the PC monitor and perhaps post a few to friends or to online galleries.
in my 35mm days, 10 x 8 was usually the largest size I printed with my enlarger, and my 35mm slides stayed as 35mm slides for projection.
Do you think these very high pixel counts are there just as a selling point or do they have practical advantage over lower pixel counts.
I prefer APS-C, and I would not like to go above 16mp for several reasons.

Geos
Geos  1 United States
24 Oct 2013 - 11:57 PM


Quote: So near & yet so far. I am Sony Fan since Sony camera started, & 7R has what I want; EXCEPT: 01- Image Stabilisation, 02- touch-screen. Why trim off these 2 important features?
An accompanying 18-100(150) zoom lens would be so friendly & practical.
Come on Sony, go for it!

DITTO! Why oh why not go with IBIS??? Panasonic has OIS yet they introduced the GX-7 with IBIS. Why, with such an adapter friendly system would you not use IBIS? Olympus has shown it can be very effective! Why no touch screen? A touch screen with touch shutter can be very useful. No GPS on a high end system? C'mon! I'll stick with my a77 till they get it right.

Last Modified By Geos at 25 Oct 2013 - 12:04 AM
Paul Morgan
Paul Morgan e2 Member 1214393 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
28 Oct 2013 - 7:27 PM


Quote: These two camera`s have a fair bit in common, but only one of these is mirrorless.

Both brands have succeeded in being different and moving away from the tried and tested route.

No joke but I think I may have made a boob, I can`t see a mirror on that Sony after all Smile


Quote: The daftest thing about these cameras - one of them anyhow - is the megapixel count. Why does anyone need 36 mp to look at a picture on a computer screen - or even print up to A0? Waste of hard drive space if you ask me.

It will be over kill for most of us Smile

PetterMagnusson

I just posted a quite subjective little hands on comparing the A7, A7r, OM-D E-M5 and Canon 5DmkIII: http://www.fotograf-stockholm.nu/first-impression-hands-on-sony-a7-a7r-vs-olympus-om-d-e-m5-and-canon-5dmkiii/

parallax
parallax e2 Member 4106 forum postsparallax vcard United Kingdom
12 Nov 2013 - 11:55 AM

I for one am definitely switching from my 5D2 to the A7R as the image quality is on a par with the D800E whilst be only half the weight. This is a great development for full frame and I will be intrigued to see how other brands respond.

tomnsuzy
tomnsuzy  2 United States
1 Jan 2014 - 6:44 PM

The biggest weakness of MFT is shooting portraits. Almost everyone would agree that the classic shallow DOF portrait shot that you can get with, say, an 85mm f/2 on 35mm full frame, or a 100mm f/4 on 6x6 medium format, with beautiful blurred-out backgrounds, looks eternally great. You just can't achieve that same look on MFT, even with lenses like the M.Zuiko 45/1.8.

That's why I still keep my OM-4 and OM Zuiko 85mm f/2, and some HP-5 and FP-4. I am seriously considering getting an Alpha 7 body for the sole purpose of portrait shooting, but I don't know… the OM-4 is just too cool a camera to abandon!

But, for most general shooting, and DEFINITELY for travel photography, NOTHING beats the form factor of MFT. I carry an MFT body, and lenses spanning 7mm to 200mm (in full frame equivalent: 14mm to 400mm) in a small shoulder bag. That's amazing. I shudder to think how big an equivalent full frame system would be - even if mirror less.

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.