Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


The Basics Of Understanding RAW Files

The Basics Of Understanding RAW Files - We take a look at RAW files so you can decide if they're something you should be shooting with.

 Add Comment

Category : General Photography
Share :

Benefits Of RAW

The main advantage of shooting in RAW is that you get to treat each shot as you want it to look and not as the camera decides it should look. When shooting JPEG files the camera carries out its own processing to create the JPEG image and information is compressed or can be lost altogether. This compression doesn't occur with RAW files (if it does it tends to be lossless compression) meaning images tend to be of a better quality. Having said that, the quality of JPEG images has improved greatly many camera models produce excellent quality JPEGs right out of camera. 

RAW files give you more control over how your end image will look. You can easily adjust the exposure and tweak the white balance once back in front of your computer, something which is harder to do with JPEG files. In Lightroom you're also given access to sharpening and noise tools which can be used on RAW files. You don't have to worry about editing your RAW files either as you can always reset your adjustments if you don't like what you see. You can also go back to RAW files time and time again if you want to change things.

 

PS RAW

 

Downside Of RAW

Because RAW files are not compressed to the extent of JPEG files, the file sizes are much larger. This means they'll quickly eat up more memory and you won't be able to save as many RAW files as you can JPEGs. The camera also needs more time to process RAW files as there's more information to deal with which can slow the time it takes the camera to write images to the memory card. Having said that, it's always worth shooting in the highest quality setting you can as you can always down-size an image file but you can't do the opposite.

RAW files need to be processed and you'll either need special software to view the images or be using software such as Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom which can read RAW files. RAW files will show with different extensions depending on the brand of camera you're using for example, Pentax RAW files have a PEF extension. 

 

Why Not Capture Both? 

There is an option to capture both RAW & JPEG files on most cameras. Yes, it means space will be eaten up quickly on your memory card but it does give you more options and it also means you have a JPEG image you can view quickly or email off quickly if someone wants a quick check / proof etc. It also means that if you like using Art Filters the JPEG image is processed with the Art Filter applied while the RAW file remains as the original image which means you'll always have something to go back to if you decide you want to create a different look or don't want an Art Filter applied at all. 
 

Lightroom

View The Photo Month Calendar

Check out more tips, features and articles.

View Calendar

Enter the Photo Month Competition

Your chance to win weekly prizes! 

Enter Competition

   

Visit The Ricoh Imaging website today for details on cameras such as the award-winning Pentax K-3.  

Explore More

Comments


pentaxpete 9 523 1 England
14 Jul 2014 9:46AM
I tried this 'RAW' business in my Pentax K10D and honestly I can't see any difference !! I used the DNG 'Raw' and put it into 'FastStone IMage Viewer' as my PhotoShop 7 doesn't do RAW processing -- there was a pic of a young girl I took with bounce flash at her Birthday party and the face was over -exposed and even with RAW I could not get the detail back. In the Darkroom with FILM I have no probs getting detail into highlights that are a bit dense - I just burn them in with a hole in a piece of card or with my hands ---
16 Jul 2014 5:57PM
This was a disappointing article as it really didn't explain anything about how to do RAW files. Just the pros and cons of using RAW files. Sad
ElSid 6 8 United Kingdom
17 Jul 2014 2:59PM
@PentaxPete

To be fair to RAW it's possible to recover a surprising amount of detail fropm blown highlights but how much may depend on the RAW converter and how much is available in the file itself. Canon's DPP can pull back about 2 stops reliably and Adobe CameraRAW about 1 stop more from a CR2 file. Beyond that it's not worth the effort. While RAW is often described as a 'digital negative' it remains in many ways more like a transparency - ie expose for the highlights - where you should aim to get it right in camera but with the knolwdge that you have a little more leeway than you get with Velvia etc...

Where I find RAW a benefit is at high ISO - raw converters generally do a more subtle noise reduction job than in-camera options - and in tricky lightling where you have the option of multiple conversions to even out white balance and exposure.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.