Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Your digital photos can be traced

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

55% OFF new PortraitPro 12 - use code EPHZROS414.
Category: Industry News

Digital cameras leave fingerprints behind - Scientists have found away to trace what camera was used to take a photograph.

Print Article Add Comment Add CommentJargon Buster: Off Jargon Buster: Off

NYU logoScientists can now work out which specific camera make and model a photo was taken on. Researchers at the Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, New York, have discovered that digital cameras leave a fingerprint in the pixels of every image taken. If this proves viable in further testing it could be used by forensic scientists in kidnap situations. Photos of the victim taken by the kidnapper could be traced back to the camera it was taken on and then this information could be used to find out where the camera was purchased and by who.

The system works as every digital camera has demosaicing software that translates each pixel into usable brightness and colours.  According to the research team the demosaicing software is made specifically for a particular camera type and the software algorithms are designed to work out what colour a particular screen pixel should be without clashing with the other neighbouring pixels colours.

Nasir Memon and his team have found a way to work backwards through theses neighbouring pixel values to discover which model-specific algorithm made it.

Early tests have show the technique can identify cameras with a 90% accuracy and further tests are to be carried out to collect more data.

Explore More

Datacolor Introduces SpyderHD

New Datacolor Calibration Suite

Datacolor introduces a new top-of-the-line calibration suite...

JVCKENWOOD Declares Support For Micro Four Thirds Standard

JVCKENWOOD Join Micro Four Thirds Standard

JVCKENWOOD corporation has declared support for the Micro Fo...

Mary Ellen Mark To Receive Outstanding Contribution To Photography Award

Mary Ellen Mark To Be Awarded At SWPA 2014

Mary Ellen Mark is to be honoured at the Sony World Photogra...

Join ePHOTOzine and remove these ads.


StuartAt e2 Member 91029 forum postsStuartAt vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
20 Nov 2008 - 11:32 AM

You would have thought looking at the EXIF would be easier!!! I bet your average kidnapper doesn't know that EXIF even exists.

Now if it was like a fingerprint of an actual camera (which is suggested), rather than a make and model then I might be more impressed!

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
20 Nov 2008 - 11:46 AM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

IanA  103048 forum posts England12 Constructive Critique Points
20 Nov 2008 - 11:46 AM

Kidnappers, in the scale of things, aren't that common, but if it could be used in cases of disputed copyright infringement, that's a different kettle of fish!

20 Nov 2008 - 12:57 PM

And why make it public?

Surely now kidnappers are aware, they can now try to work out some way of combatting it; they're not all thick....

Last Modified By Kris_Dutson at 20 Nov 2008 - 12:58 PM
20 Nov 2008 - 1:43 PM

Bang on Kris. Once again, 'The Authorities' shoot themselves in the foot.

mattmatic  10598 forum posts
21 Nov 2008 - 1:53 PM

And this method is useless if the image was shot in RAW and demoasic'd on a computer!!

- Original Poster Comments
- Your Posts

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.