Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Ok, who has this lens or at least a link to a good review?
If you own it, how do you rate it?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
I own one. Haven't had much time for photography lately but I am pleased with the results so far. There is a review here
I too own this lens and have used it for a year now , it is a fantastically sharp and clear lens , the only reservation I have with it is the focussing , it can be a little hit and miss especially when used the sonic motor , have sent mine back to be calibrated once allready and still it is only about 85 percent ...
From what I remember, this lens was a joint venture with Tokina so in terms of optical quality you might want to look for reviews of the Tokina 16-50 f/2.8
AP rated it their 'zoom lens of the year' award recently! (Feb 14th 2009)
There is a comparison here with the 16-45mm, on the Pentax User site done by Pete, that might be of interest.
I recently bought the 16-50 DA* and the 50-135DA*. I must admit it was with great trepidation as I have read some awful reviews (although the AP award and reading of their constant f2.8 prompted my interest).
Before getting the zooms I had the 21, 35 macro and 50 1.4 FA along with the 16-55mm Mk 11 and as some of my work was in low light situations I decided I needed a high quality fast zoom.
I ordered the equipment from SRS microsystems and they arrived the next day. I have always been sceptical about zooms producing the equivalent of prime lenses but in this case I have been absolutely stunned by the quality of both optics. I cannot say much about edge sharpness as most of my work involves people but to my eye the images from the 16-50 are outstanding, even at f2.8. I certainly could see a difference in images between the 16-55 mkII and these lenses. The idea of having dust and weather sealing is very attractive although this aspect has been not been tested.
People have questioned the focus capabilities. All I can say it that I have never experienced any problems and the quietness of the lens focus is quite eerie. I say this with a reasonable amount of experience as I have had particular problems with the primes, especially the 1.4. When I say problems I am sure these were down to my own poor technique rather than the quality of the lenses and I remember back 30 years ago when I would return home from the Woolwich Tramshed only to find a number of images would be out of focus. As those lenses were all manual I could not blame the lenses and accepted that the poor focus was down the cameraman and of course, the beer. I am certain that with today's Pentax equipment missed shots due to focus and camera shake would almost be absent, no matter how much beer I had drunk.
I sometimes think that we are becoming lazy and amost seem to think that the camera has a duty to make up for our own lack of technique. It's OK that is my Victor Meldrew impersonation over with.
Sorry, I should have written DA 18-55 AL II kit lens. The 2mm really does make a difference.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
This month's sponsor
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
30th April 2013 - 31st May 2013
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View May's Photo Month Calendar