Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


17-50 2.8 Tamron


annettep38 Plus
3 191 33 France
12 Jan 2012 1:32PM
I just bought one, did not go for the 'stabilized' version as I was warned by several articles.
What can I say but: It actually has less CA than the Nikkor 18-55 it replaced, is as sharp and much brighter of course. And if you think you really need the stabilizer, look a the picture 'my birthday candle' in my PF, it was taken handheld at 1/15!

Conclusion: grab one while they are still around. IMHO a very useful lens with very minimal distortion.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

GlennH 9 1.9k 1 France
13 Jan 2012 10:12AM
Gets a vote of approval from me. At that price point I think it's one of the shrewder purchases for crop-sensor DSLRs - I use one with my 60D (also the non stabilised version).
johneh 7 6 England
10 Oct 2012 8:26PM
I tried the non stabilised version first and had slight focusing issues,so I thought I'd give the stabilised version a go, (I also like to take non-flash interiors). After I tried the VC version I was absolutely sold - superb sharpness and colour, and I am able to hand hold at 1/4 sec.

Just goes to show that if you get a good match between lens and camera, test results don't always tell the whole story in the real world.Smile

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.