Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

24-105 l canon lens v canon 60mm macro lens

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
Leave a Comment
    • «
    • 1
    • »
    youmightlikethis
    youmightlikethis e2 Member 121010 forum postsyoumightlikethis vcard Scotland
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:38 PM

    which of the two above lenses should give best iq when used shooting portraits and most faithfull color reproduction

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links 
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:38 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    youmightlikethis
    youmightlikethis e2 Member 121010 forum postsyoumightlikethis vcard Scotland
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:46 PM

    one.jpg 24 -105 was a dissapointed with colour

    youmightlikethis
    youmightlikethis e2 Member 121010 forum postsyoumightlikethis vcard Scotland
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:48 PM

    two.jpgseems to be more faithfull colour 60mm macro

    ianrobinson
    ianrobinson e2 Member 41107 forum postsianrobinson vcard United Kingdom8 Constructive Critique Points
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:53 PM

    the 60mm will give very shallow depth of field and of course is fixed focal length, it will give a great IQ I am sure being prime.
    The 24-105mm f4 I am presuming will be far more versatile IMHO and gives great IQ.

    Versatility wise and great IQ i would be inclined to want the 24-105mm f4 l is usm lens for portraits out of the 2 options.

    Saying that personally i love using the canon 70-200mm f2.8 l is usm lens or the canon 85mm f1.8 l is usm lens and for tight spaces then the canon 24-70mm f2.8 l usm lens, i also own a 50mm f1.8 lens but to be honest this rarely comes out of the bag really.

    I do use the 24-105mm f4 l is usm lens for portraits if there is not enough room and find very good indeed.

    youmightlikethis
    youmightlikethis e2 Member 121010 forum postsyoumightlikethis vcard Scotland
    24 Jul 2012 - 7:58 PM

    thanks for that was using the two lenses at glasgow show same distance from stage and expected a better iq from the 24-105L

    Buchephalus
    24 Jul 2012 - 8:38 PM

    Looks like the first picture was taken in sunlight (perhaps flash) and the second shot she's in the shade. The second shot with the macro looks underexposed compared to the first. So the image colours will look different due to the colour temperature of the light hitting the subject being different the exposure will affect the saturation of the colours.
    I've both lenses and have never found a difference in colour reproduction under the same circumstances only when the colour temperature of the light changes. The macro is sharper but the 24 to 105L is no slouch in terms of image quality, a wee bit soft at f4 in the corners and vignettes at 24mm but sharpens up nicely on stopping down. I'd suggest testing both lenses under the same conditions and deciding then which you prefer. I use the 24-105 a lot for shooting weddings and never had an issue with image quality.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    Dave_Canon
    25 Jul 2012 - 3:01 PM

    The difference in lens would not make any significant difference in colour. As suggested the first image is slightly overexposed and the second slightly underexposed. It is not clear to me where the second image is focussed but the face of the singer is not in focus. I use the 24-105mm for a lot of studio portraits and it is very versatile and excellent IQ. However, the 14-105mm is not the lens for Macro work so it is horses for courses.

    Dave

    • «
    • 1
    • »

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.