0

Any Advice? - The best portrait lenses for Nikon

Forums > Lenses > Any Advice? - The best portrait lenses for Nikon

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Hello everyone,
    I would like to ask you to give me some tips for the best portrait lenses for Nikon camera. I plan to shoot both, interier and exterier. I consider to buy this one: Nikkor F1.8, 50 mm

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/5018daf.htm

    What do you think?

    Thanks
    Northy

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    7 Apr 2011 - 9:24 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    pabloisme
    7 Apr 2011 - 9:34 AM
    0

    a todays equivalent of 85-100 lens with a sensible (I am an old film user) aperture

    IF the 50mm f1.8 is used on an aps "C" size sensor all will be well

    and nokin's, minolta's and canon's all have good glass

    (think the best were in the 70's & 80's when they were pushing the boundaries)

    ianrobinson
    ianrobinson (e2 Member)
    2
    811 forum postsianrobinson vcard United Kingdom7 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Apr 2011 - 10:25 AM
    0

    sigma / canon 24-70mm f2.8 is probably the best option for portraits if you don't like the prime lens of the 50mm f1.4 or f1.2.
    In my opinion the 24-70mm is a good range and a fast lens for low light situations a real good all rounder.
    There is of course the other option of canon 24-104mm f4 l usm is lens but it is nearly 2 f stops slower.
    or if you can afford the canon 70-200 f2.8 l is usm lens i can vouch that this lens is totally awsome for portraits too but limiting in tight spaces.

    LeftForum
    7 Apr 2011 - 10:26 AM
    0

    If you have a crop sensor Nikon, then you really could not get a better portrait lens than the 50mm f/1.8D which is not only a superb lens for portraits but also, at under £100, one of the real value-for-money bargains in today's market.

    thewilliam
    7 Apr 2011 - 10:42 AM
    0

    We use the Zeiss 100mm Makro Planar and 135mm DC Nikon on a regular basis for head & shoulders and half length - these are both f2. Big groups in the studio are done with the 24-70 Nikon. On location, the 17-35 Nikon is useful when I want to show the surroundings.

    We do have an assortment of MF primes that are normally for personal work but are sometimes used when I need the wide aperture.

    Rockwell is right about the Nikon f1.8 standard lens because it's a gem for the price. His comments about Nikon lenses in general agree with my 30 years of Nikon experience.

    @leftForum:

    What do you mean by crop sensor? DX? I have DX camera now, but I want to buy FX later and I am looking for a lenses compatible with both.

    pabloisme
    7 Apr 2011 - 11:18 AM
    0

    crop sensor: there are many different sensors used look here

    and the lens is = say a 50mm on full frame/ & 35mm/film camera ON a C sensor the film 50mm equals to about 80mm

    general rule is for the future use lenses that are "film" or full frame coverage

    Last Modified By pabloisme at 7 Apr 2011 - 11:21 AM
    LeftForum
    8 Apr 2011 - 10:04 AM
    0


    Quote: @leftForum:

    What do you mean by crop sensor? DX? I have DX camera now, but I want to buy FX later and I am looking for a lenses compatible with both.

    Yes, in Nikon terminology, DX is their classification for crop sensor.

    The 50mm f/1.8D lens mentioned is an excellend portrait lens on a DX camera but would be regarded as a standard lens on an FX camera.

    Basically, on a 35mm film camera or FX (full frame) digital camera, a 50mm lens gives pretty well the same perspective as the human eye. Hence the term "standard" lens.

    On a DX (crop sensor) camera, a lens of about 30mm gives the same perspective as the human eye, hence that focal length being regarded as "standard" on such camera.

    For portraits, it is generally accepted that you want two factors:

    1. a slightly longer focal length than "standard" to give a more flattering perspective for faces. (A shorter than "standard" focal lenth has the opposite effect and makes protuberances such as noses and chins look even bigger).

    2. A large aperture which allows the depth of field to be manipulated to produce bokeh in the background so as to accentuate the actual features in the portrait.

    So, to summarise, a 50mm fast lens will be a great portrait lens with your current DX camera and, should you later switch to FX, the same lens will be a great standard lens but you may, then, want something around 85mm for portraits.

    Last Modified By LeftForum at 8 Apr 2011 - 10:05 AM
    bugdozer
    27 Apr 2011 - 8:27 PM
    0

    I have a Nikon D90 and I use this lens for portraiture. I find it gives extremely good and flattering results and many of my favourite portrait shots are taken with it. I notice the sharpness is better than equivalent shots taken with my 18-105 zoom too.

    Hi all,

    I already got the new lens so I am very happy with it Tongue

    What F-number do you usually use for outdoor portraits? I tried F1.8 and I think it is relatively OK, but...is it enough for portrait?

    LenShepherd
    28 Apr 2011 - 10:16 AM
    0

    Digressing most of the well known reviewers are rated by photographic users. Few rate Ken higher than 3 out of 10 Smile
    I am assuming you have a DX body and want to shoot portraits with "natural" perspective.
    If so the 50mm f1.8 is easily the most affordable option.
    "Better" (more expensive) options include the 60mm macro G used for the portrait shots in the 24 MP D3x brochure.
    Much more expensive lenses include the 24-70, either 85mm prime or the 105 and 135 DC lenses.
    If your budget is modest Ken might be right - provided you do not have one of the lower priced bodies that does not auto focus with D type lenses.

    Nick_w
    Nick_w (e2 Member)
    5
    2739 forum postsNick_w vcard England62 Constructive Critique Points
    28 Apr 2011 - 10:32 AM
    0

    The 50mm F1.8 is a bargain at under £100 (last time I looked) - Don't discount a Sigma 105mm Macro - for a third party lens incredibly sharp, gives a nice compressed, flattering perspective.

    all the other suggestions are excellent too.

    arhb
    4
    1046 forum posts United Kingdom56 Constructive Critique Points
    28 Apr 2011 - 10:55 AM
    0

    I mostly use the 24-70mm for the versatility it offers for doing anything from head and shoulder portraits, through to full length portraits, and with space, will show surroundings also.
    I also use the Canon 70-200mm and the Sigma 10-20mm when the occasion arises.


    Quote: There is of course the other option of canon 24-104mm f4 l usm is lens but it is nearly 2 f stops slower.

    Am I missing something Ian? I can't see how there is anything more than 1 stop difference between F2.8(24-70mm) and F4(24-105mm).....

    Cagey75
    5 May 2011 - 10:41 AM
    0

    It's really a matter of your own style and taste. I've used 50mm f/1.8, 85mm f/1.8 [which I would prefer over a 50mm] and currently use a 60mm f/2.8 macro lens for portrait. Great results, very sharp and the clarity is excellent. Being a macro means i can get in as close as I like too. I have also used a Tamron 17-50mm for portraits on the 50mm end. Also a great lens. You don't have to use a prime.

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.