0

Are landscape photo's a myth, or, do they REALY exist?

Forums > Taking photos > Are landscape photo's a myth, or, do they REALY exist?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 | Next · Last
    patters
    21 Oct 2004 - 5:20 PM
    0

    please take a look at my picture description and then maybe someone can do me a favour. Before one of you lot take one of these extrodinary foto's, can you just put the camera on full auto, and take a 'snap' of the pic your about to take and put a link on this thread to both. I'm so fed up with the results from my recent trip and would love to know what went wrong, and should I have gone out when the sun was at its lowest?
    cheers
    Pat
    xxxxxxx

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    21 Oct 2004 - 5:20 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Bernie
    8
    2201 forum posts
    21 Oct 2004 - 5:35 PM
    0

    LOL.. tried some landscape today and failed miserably.
    Great sky, nice landscape = crap shot when I'm behind the camera.

    mine here.

    Glad I'm not alone. Maybe we could start a crap at lanscapes section lol Wink)

    patters
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:34 PM
    0

    bern, at least your water has colour and youve got fluffy clouds, mine was all grey like aq pair of old pants

    plutoman
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:43 PM
    0

    Pat, generally to create good landscape shots you need to use ND Grads to balance the exposure and maybe a polariser to make the sky standout.. My failed attempts at landscapes shots also left me fairly disheartened so led me to study this site for clues and also read a couple of books.. Aside from good framing, in my opinion good landscapes need ND Grads usually, polariser probably and great natural light mostly in early morning or early evening. Although I am very much a beginner Smile You will get there eventually and so will I I hope! HTH.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:53 PM
    0

    Landscape shots are difficult.

    I suspect many if us don't realise that. It seems all too easy to point a cam at a pretty scene and assume the end product will be effortlessly wonderful.

    spookysue
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:54 PM
    0

    Oops, sorry, under Sues logon, swapping .....

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:57 PM
    0

    A 28mm on a 1.6 crop DSLR is like a 45mm on a film SLR - i.e. pretty well a standard lens. You need to get down to 17 or 18mm for a wide shot.

    ND = neutral density... think of it like sunglasses for cameras! But they are shaded from deepish grey at the top to clear at the bottom.

    andytvcams
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:59 PM
    0

    Timing and Patience is what it is all about.

    patters
    21 Oct 2004 - 7:59 PM
    0

    OK, cool, so, erm, what is ND grads, and do I need wider than my 28-105? It seems that on a digi slr with a 28 you dont get enough in????

    Also, carabosse, your soooooo right, I tried flowers/portraits etc, and although I appreciate theyre not fantastic, I was quite pleased, but the landscapes, Grrrrrr, and go see Sue's, was the best one on her lovely little Iuxus II (or whatever its called)

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:01 PM
    0

    I've replied to your questions on ND grads and wide lenses above.

    plutoman
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:06 PM
    0

    Pat if you check out the Techniques section to the left it has a section on Landscapes, filters etc...

    patters
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:08 PM
    0

    Carabosse, I know you did, my reply was left unattended, and by the time... etc etc.

    plutoman, see, SEE WHAT I MEAN ABOUT ME!! why didnt I think to look at the techniques section (sigh)

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:11 PM
    0

    The Techniques section is often overlooked on here.

    I've suggested in the past that its profile ought to be raised. Also a lot of it has a slightly dated feel to it - as if digital photography has not yet been invented.

    Nevertheless it's a good starting point.

    seven21
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:18 PM
    0

    Things I have put up with to take landscapes

    washed into the sea
    permanently wet/cold feet
    the horizon moving between taking the shot and getting the film developed
    sleeplessness
    terminal boredom
    getting marooned by the tide
    spending a mortgageable amount on filters
    dog walkers
    any walkers in bright red anoraks
    inane questions about what you are doing
    advice from anyone with a compact digital
    speeding tickets(to catch the light before it disappeared)
    the permanent feeling you are in the wrong place at the wrong time
    aggressive sheep
    permanent backache

    love it!!

    steve

    plutoman
    21 Oct 2004 - 8:20 PM
    0

    Steve it all sounds familiar Smile Pat the general techniques section has a good section on filters...

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.