Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I use a Canon D50 with a Sigma 18-200 lens. Both are 2 years old, have taken 7,500 images to date with the equipement.
I'm wondering if anyone has had a problem with degredation of the autofocus? When I first bought the camera my images were pin sharp, now, not so. Does autofocus degrade after a while? Is the the lens or the camera? Are digital cameras supposed to be taken in for a 'service' once every 5,000 pics or so? I'm furstrated...sometimes it works, other times, no so.
Any tips appreciated.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Try a sensor clean? and a contacts clean?
And possibly a service.
I have found with Sigma lenses that after a while they do appear soft and in some cases badly soft. Sent to sigma who serviced them but never really happy afterwards so tend not to use them now.
I'm sure there must be many reasons why autofocus systems don't "autofocus" on a consistant basis.....poor light, lack of contrast on the subject etc.
It's ironical that the circumstances where you need autofocus the most...i.e. fast moving subjects....are the very times it's likely to let you down.
One thing I have noticed, the autofocus on my old film Nikon F90x's is far quicker and more reliable than on any of the digital cameras I've owned.
Is there something in the digital process that makes autofocussing more difficult then with film??
Maybe someone with technical knowledge can answer this one?
partly it will be down to the difference in depth of field with full-frame, which allows for better edge contrast in your F90.
Quote: digital process that makes autofocussing more difficult then with film??
Depends on the implimentation.
Most cases its the same.
But if the film camera had an analog autofocus, e.g. sonar or another implimentation (phase detection) then it would be much more responcive than a digital contrast detection algo, which obviously has to be processed - and is not normally priority.
Quote: When I first bought the camera my images were pin sharp,
First clean the lens and body contacts - then do an AF test of a good AF target, ideally using flash as the main light source, and camera on a firm tripod. Shooting this way can you get very sharp images?
If not, providing your subject is one the AF can accurately detect, your camera or lens needs a repair.
If your camera AF is good in a static test maybe you now shoot different subjects beyond the AF capabilities of the camera and lens.
Turning to film bodies v digital - there is no AF speed difference with a good contrast target between my F5 and my D3s using single are AF
The D3 can detect a much lower contrast target than the F5, and in 51 point AF the D3 slows up because it is processing more information than in single area AF.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View July's Photo Month Calendar