Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


Best Wide Angle Lens for Under 500


Ian-Munro e2
7 200 15 Wales
17 Dec 2007 2:55PM
Hi, i have a Canon 40D and i am going to buy my first lens.

I have the 18-75 kit lens but would like a wider angle lens.

The Canon 10-22 and Sigma 10-20 come to mind.

What are your opinions on these lenses?

Thanks, Ian.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Ian-Munro e2
7 200 15 Wales
17 Dec 2007 2:57PM
Okay, sorry its been done before and i have searched for help.

your opinions are still welcome, thanks.

Ian
Simon_Palmer e2
8 759 11 United Kingdom
17 Dec 2007 2:58PM
I have owned the Canon one and it was a stunner. However many here use the Sigma and achieve mightily impressive results and it is a fair bit cheaper I believe. Me I'm a snob and would go for the Canon Wink
conrad e2
10 10.9k 116
17 Dec 2007 3:44PM
Well, I researched the subject thoroughly. The Sigma is the cheapest of the two. According to test results I saw, the Canon is slightly better in image quality. But I saw so many excellent results from the Sigma, that I now own a Sigma. Very happy with it.

Another option is the Tokina 12-24, which comes close to these two in test results (and in fact I saw one conflicting test result where the Tokina was rated slightly higher than the Sigma), although you then have two mm less at the wide end. In my country it costs almost exactly the same as the Sigma.
strawman e2
11 22.0k 16 United Kingdom
17 Dec 2007 3:53PM
I have a sigma 10-20 and have a test image in my portfolio that shows it producing very similar results to a Canon 17-40 at the 17mm end.

when I bought it the sigma was over 100 lower in cost and came with a 3 year warranty.
I've got the Sigma 10-20 and have no resevations in recommending it. Superb lens.
colin beeley e2
12 1.1k 10 England
17 Dec 2007 6:06PM
hi trooper i have the canon EF-S 10/22 & the tokina 12/24 which i got from here i have the 10/22 on my 20D & the tokina on my 10D they are both good but why pay all that for the canon you could put the rest of the money to another lens.
cb.
User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
17 Dec 2007 10:31PM
Tokina 12-24mm for me (Nikon D200)
uggyy e2
9 2.1k 9 Scotland
17 Dec 2007 10:37PM
Tokina 12-24mm for me (Nikon D200) build quality other companies should really aspire to.

Tommy
digicammad e2
11 22.0k 37 United Kingdom
18 Dec 2007 8:14AM
Another vote for the Sigma 10-20 (on a Nikon D200)
Ian-Munro e2
7 200 15 Wales
18 Dec 2007 10:09AM
Thank you for your input. On feel alone i was impressed with the sigma to be honest so i think i would save a bit of money and put it towards another lens.

Cheers

IanSmile
Dazbo e2
10 114 United Kingdom
18 Dec 2007 3:31PM
I can recommend the Sigma 10-20mm as well. I took it to Mauritius with me in September and had it on the camera 80% of the time. An example shot is here .

Darren
18 Dec 2007 4:12PM
I am being convinced more and more!

Expect severe pain in the wallot early next year!
conrad e2
10 10.9k 116
18 Dec 2007 4:38PM
Opening your wallet for this will also open up a whole new world for you, Jas!
uggyy e2
9 2.1k 9 Scotland
18 Dec 2007 5:12PM
Honestly for landscapes a 10-20 of any above will really let you do things you will be well pleased with. I prb use mine about 90% of the time when Im out chasing landscapes Smile

Tommy

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.