Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Buying my first L

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

G6DDS
G6DDS e2 Member 5231 forum postsG6DDS vcard Scotland
26 Sep 2009 - 7:41 PM

I just got engaged last weekend and instead of getting a ring that will only be worn for a year or so til we get married my fiancee has said she would get me a new lens.
I currently have a 400d but will be buying my mates 40d when he gets his 7d.
I'm really looking for an all rounder lens. I have the 18-55 kit lens, 85 f1.8, 70-300 all canon and a sigma 10 -20.

What will be the best out of the 24-70 f2.8 and the 24-105 f4

I have not been into photography long and don't have a particular area i enjoy the most yet.

Thanks in advance

Iain

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
26 Sep 2009 - 7:41 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Krakman
Krakman  73615 forum posts Scotland
26 Sep 2009 - 7:45 PM

I don't know about the lens but


Quote: instead of getting a ring that will only be worn for a year or so til we get married my fiancee has said she would get me a new lens.

it sounds like you found the perfect woman!

colin beeley
colin beeley e2 Member 111070 forum postscolin beeley vcard England10 Constructive Critique Points
26 Sep 2009 - 7:50 PM

mmmmm there will be a pay back ! 24/70 24-105 might help you make up your mind.

Last Modified By colin beeley at 26 Sep 2009 - 7:54 PM
Krakman
Krakman  73615 forum posts Scotland
26 Sep 2009 - 7:55 PM


Quote: there will be a pay back

Good point, that one could be good for several years worth of recriminations... Maybe best to go for the ring.

Then you can use your sacrifice now to argue for more lenses in the future. If you don't get the ring it may be your last lens ever.

Last Modified By Krakman at 26 Sep 2009 - 8:00 PM
User_Removed
26 Sep 2009 - 7:59 PM

First of all Iain, congrats on the engagement!
Come on lads. Where's your manners!!!

I have the 24-105 and it really is a great lens with edge to edge sharpness and a really handy range for getting n close without intruding, if you catch my drift?
Can't speak for the 24-70 I'm afraid.






God luck with your choice.












Gerry.

Coleslaw
Coleslaw e2 Member 913403 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales28 Constructive Critique Points
26 Sep 2009 - 8:03 PM

24 - 70, brilliant.

Henchard
Henchard  92744 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
26 Sep 2009 - 8:06 PM

I had the 24-105 f4.0 and sold it because I never found it that good. I now have the 24-70 f2.8 which I find far superior.

Just my 2p

ian walker
ian walker  10716 forum posts United Kingdom
26 Sep 2009 - 8:48 PM


Quote: 24 - 70, brilliant.

ditto

congrats

G6DDS
G6DDS e2 Member 5231 forum postsG6DDS vcard Scotland
27 Sep 2009 - 8:00 PM


Quote: First of all Iain, congrats on the engagement!
Come on lads. Where's your manners!!!



Thanks Gerry.

Have read various reviews etc for both lens but still none the wiser. Might have a trip to jessops and try both out, would it be best to borrow my mates 40d that i'm going to be buying or will taking my 400 give me just as good an idea?

Iain

banehawi
banehawi Critique Team 10869 forum postsbanehawi vcard Canada2869 Constructive Critique Points
27 Sep 2009 - 8:12 PM

The 24-70 is perhaps the sharpest lens made by anyone. Its sharper than the 24-105, but its way heavier, bulkier, and doesnt have that extra reach that makes it a good walk around lens.

So, - you may be walking around a lot looking for an engagement ring, - cos shes only joking about not wanting one, - so there you go!


W

G6DDS
G6DDS e2 Member 5231 forum postsG6DDS vcard Scotland
27 Sep 2009 - 8:51 PM

I bought her an engagement ring but instead of me having one too she offered to buy me a lens.

AdrianTurner
27 Sep 2009 - 10:35 PM

" All Rounder " 24-70 has to be the pick from the two listed........ it's a supurb lens, woudn't go anywhere without it.

Adrian.

LensYews
LensYews  51309 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
27 Sep 2009 - 10:48 PM

Congratulations on the engagement, I must speak to my wife to find out why this wasn't an option for us Smile

You're choice will mainly be down to what you need the lens for, if you need the sharpness, the extra stop and don't mind the weight the 24-70 would be obvious choice. If the extra reach and image stabilisation are more important, then the 24-105.

Personally my route into the L lenses was a 70-200mm, and if the focal range is appropriate for you the f4 IS could be a good choice as well.

Steve

G6DDS
G6DDS e2 Member 5231 forum postsG6DDS vcard Scotland
28 Sep 2009 - 1:28 AM

Her first offer was a 5D mk2 but i said that would be a waste of money on me just now.
Really not sure now after what you have said steve. Image stabalisation would be good for a walkabout lens but then again i may want the extra stop and sharpness.

I've been reading up alot about portrait photography and think i may be leaning towards that side of things.

LensYews
LensYews  51309 forum posts United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
29 Sep 2009 - 12:21 AM

Both lenses are good for group, full length and head and shoulder shots, but the 24-105mm will also allow those tight shots of just the face (135mm is the recommended focal length for those, which would be 85mm on a 1.6 crop camera like the 400d and 40d. Or you could get a little closer to the subject, but then there are issues of the comfort zone.

And if you need the extra low light performance you could add a 50mm f1.4 for the difference in price between the two.

Steve

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.