Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

Canned Air


ray1 e2
10 541 1 England
25 Jun 2005 5:58AM
Does anyone have any reccommendations for canned air to be used with a sensor brush. The local jessops couldnt help (didnt know what a sensor brush was). I was also thinking about one of those pump up sprayers from the garden centre.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

25 Jun 2005 6:08AM
I'm amazed by how little knowledge there is about cleaning sensors in the photography stores. Either that or they've been instructed to be cagey because of all the manafucturers dire warnings about touching the high-pass filter. I believe any canned air will work with the sensor brush because it is the friction of the brush hairs against each other, as they are blown, that loads the static charge. However you want to take care not to get propellant on the hairs. So CO2 is probably safest but anything will do with proper care. Even a foot pump vigorously used will generate enough charge.

I have sensor sweep from Copperhill. Much cheaper! This brush is charged by rubbing it on vellum paper. But each sensor brush is different.

paul indigo
indigo2 photography
ray1 e2
10 541 1 England
25 Jun 2005 6:14AM
Thanks Paul and my thoughts about the staff knowledge, especially as they give this as one of the reasons for the higher high street prices. They have two products on sale their own brand that says it contains LPG and Kenro that says its CFC free but also says it is flamable so that raised a question as to what else is in the can.
baker58 e2
11 101 United Kingdom
25 Jun 2005 6:19AM
Not speaking from experience here, but I have read that placing the brush in front of a vacuum cleaner nozzle has much the same effect at charging the sensor by sucking air through the bristles.
25 Jun 2005 6:40AM
Anything that gets the bristles to rub together produces static electricity, so the vacuum cleaner idea makes sense if it's vigorous enough. I'd be a bit wary around anything dusty though. When you do clean your sensor do it in a room that is as dust free and still as possible.
25 Jun 2005 6:56AM
Walking across your man-made fibre carpet can produce high levels of static. Just touch an earthed object to find out, afterwards.

The seat of a proposed new chair for our factory production operators was found to have a charge of 33KV on its seat when measured with a suitable instrument.

jas
User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
25 Jun 2005 7:17AM
I've said this before on other related posts; static is a killer for electronics. Keep it away from you camera.

You could a lot worse that get yourself an anti-static wrist strap as used in the computer maintenance industry, slip it on your wrist and put the croc-clip to the cold water system of the building. The kitchen stop-**** is a good place - just extend the wire.

Mike
ray1 e2
10 541 1 England
25 Jun 2005 8:00AM
Thanks guys, I cant get the brush to remove any dust and it probably puts more on so I think it is going to have to be digi pads.
User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
25 Jun 2005 8:38AM
Could try these . They get my recommendation...
ray1 e2
10 541 1 England
25 Jun 2005 8:53AM
Thought about those but have read poor reports. I suppose the problem is trying all these things starts to get expensive. I think they would probably get more sales if they gave samples out for people to try.
elowes e2
10 2.8k United Kingdom
25 Jun 2005 10:28AM
Creating static in a small brush is not likely to cause problems in an inert electronic device but care should always be taken when using static electicity to ensure any residules are discharged. Be aware that even in a small item high levels of energy can be genrated.

I would not used compressed air on my camera for any reason. They can cause instant condensation because the air can be at sub zero teperatures near to the nozzel and can blow dust at sensitive parts at high velocity rather than blowing dust away.

Hoovers are likely to introduce large amounts of dust into the room a,d settle on the camera.

If you must use static brushes (not troed them) I agree with those that can be charged by rubbing lightly on something.
User_Removed 10 17.9k 8 Norway
25 Jun 2005 11:01AM

Quote:Thought about those but have read poor reports. I suppose the problem is trying all these things starts to get expensive. I think they would probably get more sales if they gave samples out for people to try.


There are also good reports.

Ask 'em. 'Don't ask - don't get' is the maxim here. You have real fears about this whole thing - ask them to post out a couple... who knows?
ray1 e2
10 541 1 England
25 Jun 2005 12:32PM
Looks like they do a money back guarentee.
25 Jun 2005 12:43PM
Whoops. Edit mistake.
sillyconguru 10 4.4k
25 Jun 2005 12:46PM
Paul, wrong thread.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.