Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Are any of you guys using this lens on a cropped sensor.just wondering what it's like on a cropped sensor.ie.image quality, focal length etc.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Quality would still be good.
However, it won't be as ultra wide angle as you might want due to the crop factor.
It would be equivalent to a standard 28 -50 wide angle zoom (in this case 27-64mm)- and superb quality at that.
It would be aprox 27-64mm full frame equivelent.
Forgot to mention, also weather sealed.
only with a filter screwed onto the front.
Its performance is very good. For me, the only downside is I thought it was too short at the long end so i got the 17-55 as a more versatile lens.
Yeah that's what I was thinking Mike.that the only drawback.
It really depends on what you mainly want to use it for.
If the 15-85 had been on the market at the time I bought the 17-55, I would really have been tempted and traded versatility for a (not very significant) difference in IQ.
Most of the differences seem to be in colour and contrast which can be tweaked post processing.
How well does it work cropped....? ? ?
Check out " KathyW " PF, That lens has seen service on 300D, 20D, 40D, plus 5D MkI & 5D MkII, She is one very fussy gal to.....
If there is one lens in her collection that is NOT ever gonna be replaced, It is her Canon 17-40mm L.
On a full frame I wouldn't hesitate to get the 17-40, on a crop sensor the extra wide angle on the 15-85 over the 17-40 is invaluable for me.
Personally I found the 17-40mm to be better balanced on full-frame Canon breeze blocks than on a lighter crop-sensor camera. I eventually stuck a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 on my 60D, which seems a better match.
Its a great lens although its focal length can be very limiting.
I wouldn't hesitate on recommending the Sigma 17-70
I had a 17-40 on my 40D, image quality was brilliant as to be expected . As has been said previously it is not long enough for a "walkabout" lens. I did find it too limiting so I sold it.
I had a Sigma 17-70 OS which was good value for the money.
However I was offered a Canon 15-85 at a good price, so I got that. I am really pleased with it and wouldn't part with it. Highly recommended from me.
I use one on my 60D, it's my most used lens. I also have the 24-70mm that rarely gets used now that I have the 17-40. Some pics in my portfolio with that combo used.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
This month's sponsor
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
30th April 2013 - 31st May 2013
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View May's Photo Month Calendar