Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Canon 40d - Latest Price

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

New PortraitPro 12 SALE + 10% OFF code EPZROS814
tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 5:58 PM

Test image wth 40D at ISO 1600
here

Adrian

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
15 Sep 2007 - 5:58 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Coleslaw
Coleslaw e2 Member 913403 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales28 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 6:00 PM

Adrian, could you upload the full version in large?

tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 6:05 PM


Quote: Adrian, could you upload the full version in large?Quote this post

Done

Coleslaw
Coleslaw e2 Member 913403 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales28 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 6:49 PM

where?

tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 6:56 PM

It was..must be something to do with having it up with mods as well

i will investigate

Adrian

tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 6:59 PM

theres two up now...weird!!!

Adrian

tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 7:00 PM

just removed the third one

jondf
jondf  82475 forum posts
15 Sep 2007 - 7:43 PM


Quote: tomcat wrote: Test image wth 40D at ISO 1600 here

Well, it's all a bit subjective. Here's a 1600 iso image shot in low light conditions with a 30d. Is there any difference? Maybe, but which is better?

Last Modified By jondf at 15 Sep 2007 - 7:49 PM
uhtcream
uhtcream  12
15 Sep 2007 - 8:29 PM

Almost as I typed LR was upgraded. Have done a few test shots. Distant shots look soft while close ups are really sharp. Will have to investigate the settings.

strawman
strawman  1022006 forum posts United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
15 Sep 2007 - 11:51 PM

I uploaded a montage of a few test photo's I took trying the camera out. Its my latest upload if you want to see it.

Off to print some for the real test.

strawman
strawman  1022006 forum posts United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
16 Sep 2007 - 12:05 AM

I notice the price has fallen again, at this rate it will be free with a memory card by Christmas.

Is there some panic out there?

tomcat
tomcat e2 Member 85912 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom15 Constructive Critique Points
16 Sep 2007 - 9:56 AM

Thanks for the upload John
Mine was an off the cuff shot but I was quite impressed with the outcome
Weather is good at this end so hopefully off in a bit to do some field shots

Adrian

sut68
sut68  101994 forum posts England76 Constructive Critique Points
16 Sep 2007 - 9:59 AM

Looked good to me Adrian, looking forward to getting one of these myself.

Coleslaw
Coleslaw e2 Member 913403 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales28 Constructive Critique Points
16 Sep 2007 - 10:12 AM

5D is the one you want, Paul...Wink

strawman
strawman  1022006 forum posts United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
16 Sep 2007 - 3:16 PM

OK I have not posted my full conclusions till now because I was confused. In the end my thoughts are;

The 40D is a great handling camera and for wildlife and sports I think it represents a major upgrade for me but for landscapes it represents virtually no upgrade for me. The problems is where I want big prints are from my landscapes.

I re-samples the ISO100 images to 22inch high images at 300 DPI and sharpened them to suit (it was almost the same setting required). I then cut out 11 inch slices from the images for my A4 printer. I cannot spot and difference in resolution/noise. This was the conclusion I came to when I also tried the 20D.


For landscapes I am invariably using the camera on a tripod @ ISO100. Response time buffer etc, who cares.

So for up to A3 prints at ISO100 I cannot see a measurable difference. I tried a 5D, and I could see a difference at A3 size.

So my conclusion is the 40D is an improved 30D, and my 300D, but not a large step on in image quality for me. Bugger.

Will I buy a 40D, possibly as a 5D looks too expensive, but the urge to rush out and get one has gone. Oh and I did all this expecting the 40D to blow my 300D in the weeds, just like my 300D did to images produced by my previous cameras.

Now if I did a lot of sports work my views would be different.

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.