Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I've been looking at these two lenses and would be grateful for your advice/opinions between the two?
Looking at them on paper it seems such a small difference between 1.4 and 1.8 but the price is a big difference. I would be using it primarily for wedding portraiture, and good background blur is quite important.
Is the extra expense going to show in the final print as, afterall, the end result is what matters the most?
Thanks for your help,
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
The 1.4 is much better built and is more likely to last longer and more able to withstand knocks, etc. The price difference you pay is going towards the build quality more than the final result.
Oh, and have a look at the lens reviews on Photodo - check here
The 50mm f/1.4 has better build, faster focus and Gaussian lens elements for better distortion correction. I tried them both before opting for the f/1.4 version.
The blur from the f/1.4 is also excellent. An example from a wedding is here. (Magicboy's wonderful grandmother!)
An important feature from your point of view might be the metal mount of the F1.4 as against the plastic mount of the f1.8 lens, as you may be changing the lens frequently.
Do you mean that the metal mount may cause more damage or that the plastic mount may wear out quicker, Jas? The lens will be mounted on a 20D or 350D.
Very true. Was also a deciding factor for me so I should have mentioned.
1.4 has more aperture blades than the 1.8 so less angular out of focus highlights
I mean that the plastic mount is more likely to wear - become sloppy in fit etc.
The metal mount is more durable and will be a better, more consistant fit.
Jas makes an interesting point about the metal vs plastic mount - certainly you'd assume the metal is stronger (which it probably is, but that doesn't mean the plastic is weak) so let's assume this is the case and that the plastic mount is likely to break more easily.
For the price of the 1.4, you could replace the 1.8 lens almost three times if you had to before meeting the cost of the 1.4.
That said, I own a 1.4 version as I wanted the extra stop for low light shooting.
Both lenses are very good. The main descision should be whether you want the extra stop for low light work or not. Oh, and whether you want to spend the extra money or put it towards something else you might need....!
As it's for weddings I'd slightly disagree with the above.
In f/1.4 version.
Image quality is better due to the two gausian elements.
Focus is faster due to ring USM and has full time manual
Bokeh is better due to 8 diaphragm blades not 5
Less light fall off
Slight barrel distortion compared to f/1.8 version
(Correctable in PS CS)
Info is detailed here with examples
The 1.8 is rather noisy.
I guess it all depends on your budget.
F1.8 is good enough for me.
The 50mm F1.4 has the older style USM. It is quicker and quieter that the F1.8 but it does not have full time manual and the barrel still extends during focus.
Thanks, everybody, for your advice. Much appreciated,
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st July 2014 - 31st July 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View July's Photo Month Calendar