Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Is it on par with a 1dn . Had one of them and the ISo was not so good ?
But the AF was great .
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Or to add to the question .....
Would a 5dmkIII be a better option ??
so 7D or 5dmk3 ??
The 7D is a very good camera though I was disappointed to begin with as noise seemed poor in comparison with the 5DII and 5D. Using L lenses dramatically improved the image quality over the 15-85 efs.
Things have improved over time as I have come to know the camera and also I have stopped worrying so much about noise levels if I need to go above 400 iso. I use a 70-200L on the 7D and picking the right subjects helps.
As above, I find the prints do not exhibit the level of noise that a monitor does. Using Lightroom to reduce noise levels works very well.
If you want very low noise levels then the 7D is not the camera to choose.
I should add that I find using a 1.4M1 converter on the 70-200L (f4 is) degrades the image on both the 5DII as well as the 7D and would suspect the 2x would not help matters on the 7D.
Well got a 7d today . Just been out shooting at 2500 ISo and 1600 etc .
Will let you know what I think about it .
Used a 300 2.8 with 1.4 .
Thanks to you all who gave advice .
its not to bad . better then i thought it would be.
one was at 1250 and the other at 2500
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
This month's sponsor
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
30th April 2013 - 31st May 2013
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View May's Photo Month Calendar