Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I find Cartier-Bresson's photography to be amazing.
One of the things I find that happens with digital is a comment will be made along the lines of 'amazingly sharpe image' or 'I find the image is a bit soft'.
Look at Cartier-Bresson's work and what you see is the incredible content and power of his images. For some it it a bonus if they are in focus as the content is so powerful.
I recently found this little collection of his work
Why it says ephotozine I don't know but it should take you to the gallery.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
I share the wonder at his work. I have one of his books and am currently working my way through a book I received for Christmas covering some of his thoughts and photo's.
He could start a war on her with some of his views
Remember the camera is no more than your sketch book.
Let's hope 'people' don't get over zealous eh?
I think there is a world of difference between the work of Cartier-Bresson and anything I have seen produced on a digital camera and I am a digital fan.
What I can't get my head around is how powerful the images he, and other photographers of his generation, captured are. Is it just because they are from another generation?
I also like Mapplethorpe and he is my generation, bugger, where does that leave me?
I saw an exhibition of his work at the National Portrait Gallery a few years ago and was blown away !!!!!!
BBC2 then did a documentary on him where he was interviewed by this young girl who was overawed by his presence, she asked him .. "If people say you're the greatest living photographer, what would you say?" .... he thought for a moment and said the imortal line ...
Ah, the humility of genius, even that puts us to shame
Of course the accent would help!
I must be the only person in the world who finds that Cartier-Bresson's work leaves me cold. Apart from his Srinagar, Kashmir, 1948, which has an epic, film-like quality to it, the rest arouses supreme indifference.
I know he is supposed to be one of the great photographers of the 20th century but, to me, many of his images look like careless snapshots.
Pigeons, meet cat ...
Careless .... Careless ...CARELESS
Jesus, you should wash your mouth out with soap and water.
His methods were to virtually ingore the technical side, a black painted Leca so it couldn't be seen, guessed at exposure, used hyperfocal depth of field, and watched elements within his field of view to develop ... then took the shot without almost anyone knowing ...
Careless ............ phew
Some of his stuff is good, some of it leaves me cold.
No doubt he had an eye for a shot, but sometimes he forgot to take that eye with him.
Well, that's what I think, lol.
Quote: No doubt he had an eye for a shot, but sometimes he forgot to take that eye with him.
He's not the only one is he...
He was obviously very good at creating the image he wanted people to see of him!
He never created an image .... he captured them
If some of his images could be posted on ePz anonymously and without being recognised as his, I bet they would be largely ignored.
... and cat, meet pigeons.
I'm sorry but he does nothing for me. Personally I think there are folk on here who take a better image. As for waiting for the right moment, we'll never know because we weren't there. As I said, he was very good at projecting the image of himself that he wanted others to see.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar