0

d3100 teleconverter

Forums > Lenses > d3100 teleconverter

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Hi all, I have the nikon D3100 with the 55-200 lens, I would like to take more close up photos when Im out and was wondering what would be the best type of teleconverter on a budget. I enjoy trying to take pics of birds wildlife etc but enjoy taking pics at rugby matches also. Any suggestions please? Im on a tight budget so a new lens is out of the question.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    8 Feb 2012 - 2:01 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    digicammad
    digicammad (e2 Member)
    8
    21547 forum postsdigicammad vcard United Kingdom35 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Feb 2012 - 2:14 PM
    0

    How fast is the lens? If it is slower than f2.8 at the long end I would definitely recommend going no further than a 1.4x as otherwise you lose too much light.

    TCs reduce the quality of the image, so unless the lens is absolutely pin sharp you could end up being disappointed in the results and not using it. A decent TC (something like the Kenko Pro300) will cost you around £100. They get a very good review even in comparison to Nikon's own.

    Hope this helps

    Ian

    cameracat
    cameracat (e2 Member)
    8
    8160 forum postscameracat vcard Norfolk Island60 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Feb 2012 - 2:20 PM
    0

    What Ian said, PLus you would be much wiser and get much better results, If you traded that 55-200 for a 55-300 or 70-300mm Nikon lens of course....Smile

    I can vouch for the 70-300 VR its a great lens for the price, I have heard good things about the 55-300mm too, Couple that with an 18-55mm and your good to go....Grin

    Forget using a tc on that lens, the af will slow down to much and not be sharp. As mentioned the 70-300mm non vr would be a better bet and not cost much more than the 1.4 tc.
    To use a 1.4tc you really need a f2.8 or f4 lens.
    Gareth

    thx very much for your help, I will definately look into the 70-300 lens but when you say trade in do you mean in a shop like jessops or do you mean sell on ebay?

    You should be able to get more for the old lens on ebay, rather than trade in at a shop.

    thx very much Gareth, been looking at them and cant get over the price difference between the VR and non VR, also the price difference in the F4.8 (i think) and F 2.8. can the difference in price be justified in the quality for the average amateur/beginner?.

    LeftForum
    9 Feb 2012 - 11:04 AM
    0


    Quote: can the difference in price be justified in the quality for the average amateur/beginner?.

    Probably not - unless you put a value on getting sharp shots of birds and rugby. Only you can tell.

    But I certainly agree that if you are going to spend more money, then put it into glass. Also, I would heartily endorse the recommendation of the 70-300 Nikkor as an excellent budget lens.

    .

    Last Modified By LeftForum at 9 Feb 2012 - 11:05 AM
    NEWDIGIT
    10 Feb 2012 - 2:30 PM
    0

    dont bother with the converter on a 55-200 you will loose so much shutter speed i tryed it on my 3100 set up wih a freinds converter bought the 70=300 instead pretty good i think for the price

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.