Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Nikon Rumors has a really good batting average for the last year.
This one is 80% probable.
Looks to me like a cross between a D7000 and D800.
At $1500, I want to order two for my Event business.
New/updated Nikon D600 specifications:
24.7MP full frame sensor
Weight: 760g (850g with battery and memory cards), the D800 weights 900g
3.2" LCD with 921K dot with ambient sensor control
Video compression: H264/MPEG-4
Full HD with 30p, 25p, 24p, HD with 60p, 50p, 30p, 25p
Viewfinder coverage: 100% for FX , 97% for Dx
The Nikon D600 will have built-in AF motor
The body most probably will be weather sealed
The D600 may not have built-in GPS as initially reported
ISO range: 100-6400 (with Lo-1 ISO 50 and Hi-2 ISO 25,600)
39 AF points (with an option of 11 AF points), 9 cross-type AF points
AF face detection
Exposure compensation: ±5 EV (same as the D800)
The D600 will probably use the EN-EL15 rechargeable Li-ion battery
Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2012/05/23/newupdated-nikon-d600-specifications.aspx/#ixz...
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Wish they would drop video and give us a stills camera. But this does look interesting as you cant get a D800.
The D600 may well prove popular and be as hard to get as the D800!
Quote: Wish they would drop video and give us a stills camera.
You don't have to use the video if it's included you know.
In fact, if you don't use the video it works just like a stills camera. I know, I have a D300S with an unused video option. lol
All very interesting but the big question is........WHEN!?!?!?
Graysta makes a very valid point WHY DONT camera makers offer us the option Video or No Video
Personally if I want to do Vid I use my Vid camera.
I hate paying for something I know I will not use yet at the moment I have no option with the newer cameras.
Surely the No vid option would be cheaper thus letting us spend our money elsewhere
Does video cost anything on the camera? I think it comes for free.
We want live view for tripod type use, the D800 user guide tells you of the advantages, so not having live view would be a big drop off for me. So you have video out as a given there. The silicon price is driven by the processing steps yield and size. So the recurring cost is negligible for having video there. The chipset are shared with the lower down the range cameras, so it is needed for them and so removing video would need the design of special chips with lower volume so they would cost more.
So what are you left with, the cost of adding some firmware. If it sells a few more cameras then the extra sales covers the engineering cost, and may even result in a lower unit cost.
So in conclusion I do not think it would save money taking video out, and it may even result in a higher sales price. If you do not want it do not use it.
Quote: Does video cost anything on the camera? I think it comes for free.
Pretty much. Video has been standard issue on digital stills compacts almost from the outset and is now on interchangeable lens cameras as well.
Even Leica, one of the last bastions of stills-only, is apparently considering a video mode for the forthcoming M10.
A modern camera is basically a computer that takes pictures.
The production cost of a computer chip-set depends more on the size of the production run that its compexity. Manufacturers tend to design cameras to do as much as possible and widen their appeal to maximise the number of punters likely to buy them.
Nikon tends to use the same chip-set in a wide range of models so that the entry-level body can deliver much the same picture quality as the "pro" models.
Now that the Sendai and Thailand plants are back in production, I expect Nikon will catch up with a few more models.
I'm going to be watching out for the release date on this one, think it could be a really nice partner for the D700 seeing as I can't really afford the D800.
For me - no.
That is because I want to make A2 prints.
D800 for me.
Len, do you remember the days when we made 30x24 inch prints from our 6 Megapixel cameras?
OK, we were doing portrait photography rather than landscape. And our old Kodak DCS760 bodies didn't have AA filters so we could squeeze out the last bit of sharpness.
Quote: Len, do you remember the days when we made 30x24 inch prints from our 6 Megapixel cameras?
It depends who you mean by "we" - and how much fine detail in prints.
I am fully aware from side by side comparisons of 30 inch wide prints 12 MP is an obvious distance behind "affordable" medium format digital.
I am not disputing you can make 30 inch prints from 6 MP - provided you accept either a significant lack of detail viewed close or you stand far enough back not to be able to see what has not been captured.
Len, how many portrait customers, especially female, welcome extreme detail in the rendering of their skin? In the good old days of film in a Hasselblad, we often used a Softar because the lenses were too sharp.
Never let the truth spoil a good picture!
d800 v hd40
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Are you a Nikon owner? Check out Nikon Nation to find the latest Nikon news, reviews, discussion and photos on ePHOTOzine.
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar