0

Digital SLR for wildlife photography

Forums > Digital cameras > Digital SLR for wildlife photography

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last
    adammalski
    26 Apr 2004 - 11:13 PM
    0

    I currently use a Nikon F65 (35mm) SLR and a 'teased' to go digital.

    3 questions. Would a digital SLR produce the same image quality as my Nikon? If so which ones should I be looking at? Will the quality of the digital SLR range improve much more from 6million pixels?

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    26 Apr 2004 - 11:13 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    keithh
    8
    20891 forum posts Wallis and Futuna6 Constructive Critique Points
    26 Apr 2004 - 11:30 PM
    0

    1. Yes
    2. You pays your money.......
    3. It already has.

    mattw
    mattw (e2 Member)
    8
    5079 forum postsmattw vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Apr 2004 - 3:54 AM
    0

    Adam,

    1) The quality issue really depends upon what you do with your images. Printed out up to A3 size, I have found that digital gives better quality.

    2) I don't think there are any duff ones. If you have Nikon lenses (and want to stay Nikon) then the D70 is the obvious choice. Otherwise the Canon 300D and 10D are the most significent alternitives.

    Mattw

    adammalski
    27 Apr 2004 - 7:54 AM
    0

    Thank you very much. I'll be shopping around for a digital SLR (perhaps the D70) and sticking with my Hassleblad XPAN for landscapes.

    Ad

    mattw
    mattw (e2 Member)
    8
    5079 forum postsmattw vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Apr 2004 - 9:52 AM
    0

    Go for it - I very much drought you will regret it!

    Just Jas
    27 Apr 2004 - 11:36 AM
    0

    Dry weather camera Matt? LOL

    jas

    EOSPETE
    27 Apr 2004 - 11:47 AM
    0

    I use my D60 6.3Mp to produce 30x20 inch prints without grain and pixelation with the help of Genuine Fractals. Many pro wildlife photographers have used D60 and 10D and I think some of the 1D series are actually less than 6.3Mp but full frame.

    300D is a good budget option. 10D is better AF than D60 and better noise characteristics _ I am hopefully upgrading for 60 to 10 this weekend. Below 1500 this is the Canon range you need to be looking at. Can't afford above that so I'll let others give advice.

    Like any system the final image quality is also determined by the lenses you put on the front.

    P

    User_Removed
    27 Apr 2004 - 11:50 AM
    0

    Following on from Pete's comment - there is no 1D series dSLR that is below 6.3Megapixel in resolution and full frame.

    The original 1D is just over 4megapixel but smaller than 'full frame'. Having said this, the image quality is generally considered better than that from camera with 6+megapixel res (due to the type of pixel employed).

    The 1Ds is full frame and has an 11 megapixel resolution and the new 1D Mark II is 8 megapixel but not full frame

    Bet you're glad to know all that!

    Barrie

    tim franklin
    27 Apr 2004 - 12:35 PM
    0

    Bet you're glad to know all that!

    You bet! Rub it in Barrie (as the actress said to the bishop!)

    mattw
    mattw (e2 Member)
    8
    5079 forum postsmattw vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Apr 2004 - 12:47 PM
    0

    Hey Barrie, now you have a 1D2, you won't be using your 1Ds anymore will you.....

    Mattw

    User_Removed
    27 Apr 2004 - 1:02 PM
    0

    That's why it's for sale Matt (ad in classifieds if anyone is interested).

    I have another 1D-II on back order and this will replace the 1Ds

    Barrie Smile

    EOSPETE
    27 Apr 2004 - 8:31 PM
    0

    Thanks for the info Barrie

    Tim
    By the way - does anyone actually know the joke about the actress and the bishop as I have been waiting for years to find out? These are the important issues we should be debating Wink

    Cheers
    P

    EOSPETE
    27 Apr 2004 - 8:35 PM
    0

    To actually answer the question and to drop a few names in, with no particular order

    Moose Peterson (Nikon)
    Arthur Morris (Canon)
    Andy Rouse (Canon)
    Jim Brandenberg
    Joe and Mary Ann MacDonald (Canon - I think)

    Seem to do alright shooting digital wildlife.

    P

    geoffw
    8
    35 forum posts United Kingdom
    27 Apr 2004 - 9:00 PM
    0

    The D70 is absolutely fine for wildlife
    photography,even with my manual focus
    500mm[750mm]f 4 P lens.This lens was factory
    fitted with the chip so lens and camera
    communicate.NEF files have no grain and
    will easily enlarge to A3.I don't think
    I need film now!

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.