Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Quote: camera profiles and lens profiles are not the same.
Exactly my point, it appears you have created lens profiles.
Adobe do not have multiple camera profiles with different lenses.
BUT they do have multiple lens profiles for a particular camera.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Quote: Exactly my point, it appears you have created lens profiles
Wake up and open your eyes
Quote: Adobe do not have multiple camera profiles with different lenses
Lol your quick
It's a slightly flawed idea, Paul, but what the hell - I just uploaded a quirky collector's edition Sony DSC-R1 profile, since nobody else on the face of the planet is ever likely to profile that camera again. I know one or two people use them around here. The colour I got from the R1/Lightroom was infinitely better after I created that profile. Hasn't appeared yet - I guess it needs approval first.
Jeff, different camera profiles are created for different lenses to account for the variation in lens colour characteristics. Those characteristics probably shift negligibly between marque lenses, but when you have a motley collection of multi-branded optics it becomes a bit more critical. The lens profiles you're talking about correct for distortion and vignetting, but the colour effect is not measured (I've created one or two lens profiles, though it's a rigorous process that tests my 5-minute attention span).
What software did you use to build the profile.
I`m not even sure if the profiles upload work when there downloaded, they were fine when I uploaded them but I tested a few and each file shows 0 bytes, they should be at least 150kb.
There`s certainly no shortage of people wanting or offering profiles.
for those of us who are not technically minded could someone please explain:
what this is for?
why are there only 14/15 profiles for cameras I've never heard of - or unlikely to use?
why would we want to download?
what are we uploading if we want to join in?
apologies if this was announced elsewhere....seem to have missed it
Profiles like pre-sets can be shared.
But unlike pre-sets, profiles only work with if you happen to be using the same camera body.
This is a typical example of the effects of applying a profile, some profiles can have quite a marked effect, others can be quite subtle, there often better than using the default profiles as supplied by Lightroom giving you a better base level to work from.
GF2 + 14mm, note the changes to the reds and blues.
There is a whole lot of stuff about profiling on the web like this to give you some idea how it all works.
That difference in blues seems very common between Lightroom and ColorChecker Passport profiles. Here is someone else offering profilesóJay Kinghornóbut note he says you'll get better results making your own, which is sheer inevitability. I don't mind chucking a few profiles into the pot, but last night's effort seems to have disappeared into the ether (it was the right file type).
Yes I agree, nothing beats having your own, I`ve just shared a handfull that will improve daylight and flash somewhat, there better than the adobe standard profile and will give a better base level to work from.
Quote: but last night's effort seems to have disappeared into the ether (it was the right file type)
They will take a few days to show, but I`ve sent in a report, the files get minced during the download and will not work, the also show as 0 bytes of data
Quote: So your trying to tell me no two 5D Mk111 sensors will be the same or deliver the same results :
Nope, I'm trying to tell you that even same-model cameras can vary in their output. Do you imagine Adobe don't use actual 5D MkIII bodies when creating profiles? They're providing you with a generic profile, you're rejecting it, and now you're providing someone else with a generic profile, which is what it becomes when it's not applied to your camera.
That's certainly how I see it.
My understanding is that although all sensors vary slightly, when fitted to a camera they are then calibrated to tight tolerances.
I guess some of you would rather run the Adobe default profiles in Lightroom, I don`t know about other camera`s but I know the single profile used for Panasonic and Olympus is pretty horrible.
I think they can vary significantly, Paul, between manufacturing process batches, but at the same time I don't see great harm in what you're trying to do - it's just a different 'recipe' if you like, not entirely transferable but it might be preferable in some cases. One thing though is standard Adobe profiles are usually pretty 'safe' - they don't clip colours easily, whereas in my experience colours do teeter on the edge a little more with home-made profiles. I think that's by Adobe design, but could equally signify a need for me to refine my profile-making technique!
Without a shadow of doubt the colours from my own profiles are frequently more accurate, and though I don't usually need great accuracy there are times when I take a photo because of a specific hue. Often that's lost in the Adobe profile (that blue shift being a prime example).
Generally the main times I use profiles is at a wedding or shooting portraits, these are generally the times when I need a more consistent base level to work from.
Quote: whereas in my experience colours do teeter on the edge a little more with home-made profiles. I think that's by Adobe design, but could equally signify a need for me to refine my profile-making technique!
Care is needed, I first set a custom WB then photograph the target taking care not to clip the highlights or shadows, exposer needs to be spot on, its pretty fool proof using the xrite software, if you did happen to clip something, the software will flag a warning and not let you proceed.
A lot of people complain that working from Raws with Olympus Cameras there well loved colours are lost, profiling comes very close to getting these colours back.
The profiles I have shared are just good generic profiles like I said, it would be pretty pointless sharing some of my others
The profiles are back up for download now the bug has been fixed, I`ve also added profiles for the GF2.
They can be found here.
My modest offering is still AWOL. It'd be interesting to see feedback on whether these actually improve matters for anyone or not, even though 'improvement' might be a little subjective.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st April 2014 - 30th April 2014
18th April 2014 - 25th April 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View April's Photo Month Calendar