Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
While gazing at the galleries I thought I sensed some marked preferences for subjects - purely in terms of 'clicks' - and whiled away, out of curiosity, 10 minutes with a very rough and ready 'average' over the last 4 (x16 images) pages by subject.
Landscapes 6+
Sport/action 3
Flowers 4+
Animals 4+
Portrait/peeps 6+
Digi Manip appx 7
...now I wonder if this reflects our preferences for subjects, or the skill of EPZers in particular subject coverage?
Or if it matters ![]()
Rich
*Apologies if this is covering old ground, just read Ceri's post re colour blindness...oops
My top interest would definately be wildlife. However, I've noticed that of recent I've clicked and commented disproportionately on scantily/un-clad women. This probably has more to do with the missus now living 200 miles away than than anyartistic bias though. I think...
Lee.
NB: Please forgive ant typos, my eyesight seems to be failing of recent ![]()
i think sometimes people are just interested in something different or unusual, no matter what the category. we are so conditioned to seeing 'snapshot' style photography here that something different makes the finger clic the thumb and check it out. my observation and personal experience.
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.












