0

Exposing to the right.

Forums > Taking photos > Exposing to the right.

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 | Next · Last
    scala
    4
    48 forum posts
    1 Sep 2009 - 11:56 AM
    0

    I have recently discovered an exposure technique - now widely accepted for landscape photography apparently - that involves exposing as far to the right of the histogram scale as possible before clipping occurs. The science being that the brighter stops on a DSLR record over 2’000 tonal values compared to the darker stops which record as little as 60 (the 4’000 plus tones available not being even split through the stop range. ).

    I’ve always slightly under-exposed my shots and then adjusted in RAW, but I’ve now learned it’s better to over expose and claim back in RAW as you have a greater tonal range to work with and therefore more detail available. I haven’t had the change to try this out yet, but does anyone else work this way?

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    1 Sep 2009 - 11:56 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Coleslaw
    Coleslaw (e2 Member)
    6
    12761 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales27 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 11:58 AM
    0


    Quote: but does anyone else work this way?

    yeap.

    brian1208
    brian1208 (e2 Member)
    8
    7534 forum postsbrian1208 vcard United Kingdom12 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 12:21 PM
    0

    me to, and not just for landscapes

    scala
    4
    48 forum posts
    1 Sep 2009 - 12:23 PM
    0

    Are the differences really noticeable?

    Shawry
    6
    384 forum posts United Kingdom6 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 12:26 PM
    0

    Depending on what I am shooting yes

    strawman
    1 Sep 2009 - 12:30 PM
    0

    Sometimes I use this technique, but it depends on the dynamic range the scene has. More often I find myself taking HDR shots for tricky scenes.

    discreetphoton
    discreetphoton (Site Moderator)
    7
    3077 forum postsdiscreetphoton vcard United Kingdom19 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 1:56 PM
    0

    For everything, wherever possible. You'll often find that working at higher ISO's for over-exposure, then correcting, will give smoother results than lower ISO's at the true EV rating. Try it, it can be quite surprising.

    Last Modified By discreetphoton at 1 Sep 2009 - 1:59 PM
    Coleslaw
    Coleslaw (e2 Member)
    6
    12761 forum postsColeslaw vcard Wales27 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 2:19 PM
    0

    really?!!

    stolzy
    6
    3753 forum posts7 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 2:25 PM
    0


    Quote: but does anyone else work this way?

    Absolutely - it's the only way to get shadow detail. I like lots of dark in my studio pictures and the only way to have detail in the shadows is to expose well to the right (even at the sacrifice of unimportant highlight detail) and darken with levels in PS.

    Otherwise I get lots of ugly posterisation in the shadow areas.

    I think the usable tonal range of digital imagers is a lot less than that quoted - if you want shadow detail.

    discreetphoton
    discreetphoton (Site Moderator)
    7
    3077 forum postsdiscreetphoton vcard United Kingdom19 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 2:28 PM
    0


    Quote: Really?!!

    Can do. I managed to get this at 2000 ISO by going a stop and a half over.

    scala
    4
    48 forum posts
    1 Sep 2009 - 3:07 PM
    0

    Interesting stuff. I can't wait to give this a try now.


    Quote: ...working at higher ISO's for over-exposure, then correcting...

    Can you explain a bit more fully please? My brain's not taking it in.

    ckristoff
    1 Sep 2009 - 5:17 PM
    0

    Discreetphoton,

    that's most interesting. Your image looks great.

    The last time I used my camera, I didn't check the settings, so I took a bunch of photos with iso at 1600, in broad daylight! Smile


    Frank.

    f8
    f8 (e2 Member)
    8
    9167 forum postsf8 vcard England22 Constructive Critique Points
    1 Sep 2009 - 5:27 PM
    0

    Surely,if you over expose the highlights you burn the detail out.where do you get the detail from to put back?
    Quote: I have recently discovered an exposure technique - now widely accepted for landscape photography apparently - that involves exposing as far to the right of the histogram scale as possible before clipping occurs. The science being that the brighter stops on a DSLR record over 2’000 tonal values compared to the darker stops which record as little as 60 (the 4’000 plus tones available not being even split through the stop range. ).

    I’ve always slightly under-exposed my shots and then adjusted in RAW, but I’ve now learned it’s better to over expose and claim back in RAW as you have a greater tonal range to work with and therefore more detail available. I haven’t had the change to try this out yet, but does anyone else work this way?

    The aim is to expose as far to the right as you can, without clipping, as the OP stated. If it's not clipped, it's not burned out, just brighter than you'd expose for otherwise.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.