Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
i would like to know is an interesting foreground is a must on landscape photo?
is it wrong to put point of interest in mid or background and leaving the foreground empty.?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Not wrong just not the norm, experiment it's up to you after all.
It's just like the rule of thirds, our eyes/brains are made up that way and we like to put things into a kind of symmetry but whatever pleases you personally is ok.
Sometimes a seemingly empty foreground can be used to give a feeling of space or desolation to great effect, or if you want to concentrate the viewers eye on a main subject that is far off/in the mid/background, less is more so to speak..
Some photos make use of lead in lines in the foreground to take your eye to the point of interest. This does allow a simple foreground but it does depend upon what you are trying to achieve.
Some people with those super wide angle lenses might have their toes as foreground interest.
Quote: i would like to know is an interesting foreground is a must on landscape photo?
No, it is not a must.
Quote: is it wrong to put point of interest in mid or background and leaving the foreground empty.?
No it is not wrong, some landscape photos don't even have a foreground and are perfectly fine without one.
However, if you intend to include a foreground in a photo then it may as well be interesting or have a function otherwise it may be superfluous to requirements.
Thank you for answering my question. actually i am a little confuse about this interesting foreground, especially when applied it into the scene. still need more practice i think.
Many landscapes are helped by some foreground interest, but I feel this is sometimes overdone, so that the foreground dominates , and it is not clear whether the foreground or other elements in the scene are the intended focal point for the viewer.
It might be worth searching for "landscapes" in Google Images, which will bring up dozens of examples to consider and get some ideas from...
It all depends on the lens you are using and I would generalise by saying the wider the lens the more important foreground/miground object is. The widest commonly used focal lengths are 17mm on 35mm camera (10mm on APS-C, 8mm on MFT) a distant bacground is very small in the frame and you need foreground elements to give the eye something to latch onto and stop pictures looking repetitive. But as has been said, it may be an effect you want occasionally.
Having just looked through your portfolio, you obviously have a good eye, and make the most of diagonals as lead-ins. I would say carry on with what you are naturally doing "if it isn't broken, don't fix it!"
have a go with the long lens - you can pick out some cool shapes - here's a curvy road in Swaledale... foreground was about 1/4 - 1/2 mile away
an interesting sample of foreground Ade, that's very clear to me...
Couple of Different uses of Foreground here:
Dead sheep are good
Avoid sticks. A stick is just a stick, it is of no interest to anybody, much less if it happens to be the only thing for 1/2 mile on a beach.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st April 2014 - 30th April 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View April's Photo Month Calendar