0

Framing a photo

Forums > Photographic discussion > Framing a photo

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last
    phil_24
    27 Jun 2007 - 5:15 PM
    0

    so ive got a 20" x 8" frame and a 20" x 8" photo to put in it. I put the photo in the frame, attach the back...hold up and stand back but...you guessed it...the dredded "wet" looking marks.

    in other threads the solution seems to be mat it by creating a cardboard surround and then a bigger frame but now ive bought the frame i want to use it...are there any other solutions??

    thanks in advance?

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    27 Jun 2007 - 5:15 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    sherlob
    sherlob (e2 Member)
    6
    1696 forum postssherlob vcard United Kingdom102 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jun 2007 - 5:38 PM
    0

    Hi Phil,

    I have no answer for you, but two observations:

    1. I have been told that the mount allows the picture to 'breathe'. This movement helps stops the wet look effect.

    2. Gloss prints always seem to be more prone to a wet look (IMHO).

    Regards,

    Adam

    Order a smaller photo for your frame and buy a mount.

    phil_24
    27 Jun 2007 - 8:21 PM
    0

    think its safe to say thats the easiest way...its just i feel the photo looks so good in the frame with no border

    You could try cutting a mount which is very small so that it acts as a spacer keeping the picture away from the glass, but is not seen from the front (it is hidden by the frame rebate).

    Dave

    Last Modified By davidentrican at 27 Jun 2007 - 11:11 PM
    brian1208
    brian1208 (e2 Member)
    8
    7533 forum postsbrian1208 vcard United Kingdom12 Constructive Critique Points
    28 Jun 2007 - 5:33 AM
    0

    I use the method Dave describes. You need to have the print bonded firmly to a backboard to stop bowing and its a bit of a pain getting the "mount" invisble to the viewer but it can look good.

    Another way I'm doing it is to remove the glass. It depends on the quality of paper / ink and what the environment you are going to hang the print in though and you have to bond it to the backboard again.

    I do this with pigment ink prints on heavyweight art papers, coated with protective varnish and they look beautiful.

    peterjones
    28 Jun 2007 - 9:27 AM
    0

    I mount prints the way that the picture framers do: just stick the print to the back mount by the top edge only thus allowing the print to hang freely within the mount.

    That way if there is differential expansion of the print and the mount the two can move independently without causing the print to wrinkle as often seen at camera club exhibitions.

    It does work; since using this method print wrinkling is a thing of the past for me.

    brian1208
    brian1208 (e2 Member)
    8
    7533 forum postsbrian1208 vcard United Kingdom12 Constructive Critique Points
    28 Jun 2007 - 10:15 AM
    0

    I use the same method with mounted prints and it does the job as you describe Peter. However, in my experience, without a mount to keep the print flat (ie: when I frame without glass there is no mount) the print needs bonding to the backboard to keep it firmly in place. Likewise with an "invisible" mount inside the frame recess.

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.