Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
But the autofocus is S L O W Josh.
(And this is a £1000.00 camera!)
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Think I`ll wait and see what comes out in the way of firmware upgrades
Quote: But the autofocus is S L O W Josh.
(And this is a £1000.00 camera!)
How is the actual motor speed? Would you say that AF speed was motor limited or rather contrast detection limited.
I'm hoping it's more of a software problem :x
Quote: contrast detection limited
(A motor can only respond to the data received - once the focus point was selected, the motor responded the moment the data was fed.)
Thanks Mike but what I was implying is that some motors are just faster than others, all other things being equal. The very good Panasonic 20mm lens is the bottleneck on all m43 cameras for instance. It's motor is just slow.
Judging by your answer, there would be hope and room for improvement.
Quote: ...there would be hope and room for improvement.
Not only IMO, but those around myself and a good friend at the time, agreed that this issue needs to be addressed. Indeed, 'how can they bring something to market with such a retail price and be so off the mark' was a common consensus.
I was quite prepared to walk away with one yesterday (two other mainstream dealers had stock - whilst interestingly, the rep I spoke to on their stand said that they would have a 'small stock available in a few days'?) but hearing the comments as the camera was passed to me - and then seeing for myself how bad it was - I walked away.
BTW - Welcome to EPZ!! Enjoy your time here... It's the best around
Thanks for your detailed input and the warm welcome Mike !
What version of the firmware did the cameras have? I am asking because this data seems to contradict what others that have the camera in Japan are posting. If it is true in version 1.0, then Fuji will have to quickly address it to meet the specifications in their owner's manual of 0.17 Sec going to 0.4 sec with OVF poser save ON.
Obviously against the Leica x1 at least it has a viewfinder
Just to change the thrust of the comments a wee bit:-
Apart from the problems that have been identified by those who have actually handled the camera (and apart from the fact it looks a bit like an old Leica), what positive features does this camera have that would make it worth the money (or even half the money)?
Could someone explain the accuracy of the OVF frame lines compared to the EVF or screen?
This is where the camera either succeeds or fails.
Quote: Could someone explain the accuracy of the OVF frame lines compared to the EVF or screen?
I`ve not seen or handled the camera in the flesh but I can`t see a problem with frame lines, the camera has a fixed lens.
The OVF frame lines are the same as on a Leica, approx 90%. This allows you to see outside of the frame lines. The EVF is 100%, same as the LCD on the back.
I'm an M shooter for over 45 years.
I've heard the the X100 is around 80% compared to Leica 92-94%.
This would concern many M shooters. I saw a few examples that raised a flag to me and I'm sure others as well.
Thanks for the reply.
Please read the owner's manual. It is 0.5x 90%. The PDF is available on line from multiple sources.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar