Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I just wondered why Fuji did not go that bit further and fit an APS-C sensor or even a 4thirds sensor in the X-S1. They could have used the X-100 sensor. Is there a technical reason they didn't or is there a commercial reason?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
larger sensors need larger lenses - the cost (and weight) of creating an APS-C version with the same focal range as the X-S1 would be enormous.
Thanks, I see what you mean, would this also apply to a 4thirds size sensor.
yes - look at the panasonic G3 - arount £350 with the kit lens, you would have to add a 100-300 lens (costing another £420 ish) to cover most of the range of the X-S1
I know the advantages of the Fujifilm X-S1 lens. Its focul range is probably more than I would ever need. Apart from the extra lens costs of a DSLR/ M4thirds system, I looked at other points in the Fuji's favour as well, one lens, one filter, one lens hood, one small kit bag and no dust problems.
If you have several detachable DSLR or M/4thirds lenses, each with a quality filter and lens hood per lens at roughly £35 each, a largish kit bag, it works out pretty expensive and heavy, I think the Fujiflm X-S1 sells its self.
Now look at the new entry level X-E1 from Fuji, Wow!
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar