Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
hi, i'm looking to get extra reach on a budget. At the moment i'm using a D800 with the 70-200 2.8 but its not enough for the sports events i do ( football, rugby and motocross ) I can't afford the 'big' lenses so was looking for another way The ways i have come up with is are ; an x2 extender - Sigma 150-500 - 300 f4 or just keep saving for a second hand Sigma 300 f2.8. Any thoughts please ?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
A 1.4X extender will put you out at 280 f4 depending upon the 70-200 you have then the drop in quality is not meant to be to bad, 2X extenders have a much bigger hit in terms of quality from my research... I don't really know a great deal about the Nikon "farm" of lenses but Canon has a couple of offerings in the 400mm range that I am sure Nikon have a competitor for though in the 100-400 and 400mm f5.6.
I looked at the sigma and don't think it is gonna be great for sports although I have seen a few nice motorsports tracking shots from it I think it would struggle with football and rugby. the Sigma 120-300 OS f2.8 gets good reviews but is beyond my budget at the moment but it will probably be my next purchase coupled with a 1.4 TC
Avoid a 2X telecon, With a half decent 70-200 a 1x4 or 1x7 from Nikon would be a better option all round.
Either of those would have far better resale value, If at a later date you go down the bigger lens route....
How much 'extra reach' do you want/need? And how much are you willing to spend waiting to afford the 300mm f2.8? Does this need to be coupled with superior AF speed and/or focus tracking ability?
The Sigma 120-400 seems to get a better press than the 150-500 on some birding forums which (because of the demands on the lens, I find these good practical guides for long lenses).
Have been edging towards an extender as its the cheapest option Just never had the chance to use one Was talking to a 'pro' at the greyhounds last week who was using a Canon 600mm with a 1.4 extender. He showed me his shots on the back of his camera, to say i was impressed would be an understatement !! lol. Think i'll give a 1.7 a try. Thanks
With the quality of the D800, I think you will be able to get 280mm with 1.4tc then crop by 50% in each dimension (to get 25% of the image area) to get 500mm+ and still be able to easily print to A3.
Hi Lee, if you don't go to too many events then would renting a lens be an option for just the times you need it?
why would you need a 600mm plus a 1.4 at the dogs ?
Quote: Shitzu racing?
I shan't be able to shake that image out of my mind for a while Mike, I'd love to see that
Right now the most affordable option is a Kenko Pro 300 1.4 X - it will give you decent quality, 280mm equivalent and reasonable AF speed
It costs a a lot less than a 300mm f4 prime lens and retains the advantage of a zoom lens for your type of sports photography.
Most professional football photographers seem to use a 70-200 plus a 400mm f2.8 - well above most peoples budget.
Switching the lens between the D800 and a D7100 in 1.3 crop mode gives 15 MP, 400mm equivalent angle of view, no loss of AF speed, and AF points across the entire width of the picture area.
I hear some prps are seriously looking at a second 70-200 on a D7100 body to avoid the cost of the 400 f2.8.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar