Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

Like 0

Group test

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

keith selmes
20 Aug 2009 - 11:32 PM

I have a Sony hi fi amplifier so I suppose their cameras must be good Smile

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links 
20 Aug 2009 - 11:32 PM

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

Just Jas
Just Jas  1225727 forum posts England1 Constructive Critique Points
21 Aug 2009 - 12:59 AM

Well, that says it all! Wink

Snapper_T
Snapper_T e2 Member 10848 forum postsSnapper_T vcard United Kingdom
21 Aug 2009 - 7:54 PM

Was that a sigh Jas? Smile

I've on stuck with KM/Sony because it was too costly for me to swap brand, but if I had I would be using Nikon because of the build and ergonomics of the D200 and upwards.

Up to now I'm glad I stayed put. They're not doing too bad me thinks Smile
Trev

Last Modified By Snapper_T at 21 Aug 2009 - 7:56 PM
Just Jas
Just Jas  1225727 forum posts England1 Constructive Critique Points
21 Aug 2009 - 10:31 PM

If one is thinking of changing kit a good maxim is stay put with what you've got.

southsnapper
22 Aug 2009 - 9:19 PM

Is owning a Canon or a Nikon akin to a the long bonnet syndrome for sports car owners? (male owners of course) Grin

Paintman
Paintman e2 Member 7824 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom172 Constructive Critique Points
22 Aug 2009 - 9:35 PM

I think that's down to the length ( and girth ) of your lens regardless of make. Canon and Nikon just make the best DSLR's around.




Although I could be wrong.

joolsb
joolsb  927115 forum posts Switzerland38 Constructive Critique Points
22 Aug 2009 - 9:55 PM

You are. But you knew that anyway. Wink

Last Modified By joolsb at 22 Aug 2009 - 9:55 PM
Paintman
Paintman e2 Member 7824 forum postsPaintman vcard United Kingdom172 Constructive Critique Points
22 Aug 2009 - 10:27 PM

Only justSmile

MattGrayson
24 Aug 2009 - 5:30 PM

It was a very close call on all cameras, but the noise images from the A700 were much better than the other cameras. Bear in mind that for a camera older than most of the competition, it stood up to them with defiance and I found that quite remarkable. Smile

Snapper_T
Snapper_T e2 Member 10848 forum postsSnapper_T vcard United Kingdom
27 Aug 2009 - 7:08 PM

Thanks Matt, now can you get your hands on the A850 for a test?

JJGEE
JJGEE  96207 forum posts England18 Constructive Critique Points
27 Aug 2009 - 7:15 PM


Quote: Thanks Matt, now can you get your hands on the A850 for a test?

From what I have read elswehere the test would be the same as the A900, which Matt has already done.
The only differences are: the 3 instead of 5 frames per second and 98% instead of 100% viewfinder

Oh, and of course, the price !

Last Modified By JJGEE at 27 Aug 2009 - 7:16 PM
Snapper_T
Snapper_T e2 Member 10848 forum postsSnapper_T vcard United Kingdom
27 Aug 2009 - 9:25 PM


Quote: Quote:Thanks Matt, now can you get your hands on the A850 for a test?From what I have read elswehere the test would be the same as the A900, which Matt has already done.
The only differences are: the 3 instead of 5 frames per second and 98% instead of 100% viewfinder

Oh, and of course, the price !

True, but I hope the high ISO noise performance has improved.

Add a Comment

You must be a member to leave a comment

Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.