Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

Hey, where's my thread gone?!!!!!!!!!!!!


AdrianTurner 10 350 Wales
20 Apr 2005 2:34PM
I posted a new topic entitled

So, the 1st duck said to the 2nd duck ........

and within minutes it had become "one of the disappeared" whats going on and why?

Adrian.

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

ejtumman 10 2.8k England
20 Apr 2005 2:35PM
Lack of content, probably. LOL
answersonapostcard e2
10 12.7k 15 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 2:36PM
Perhaps it waddled off somewhere?
ewanrayment 10 718 1 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 2:38PM
Was that along with the other 4399?
AdrianTurner 10 350 Wales
20 Apr 2005 2:40PM
Emma, The idea was for others to provide content with witty tag lines.

Ewan,
Quote:Was that along with the other 4399?
???

K, as a cyber-cop, I mean moderator (chukle), do you have any idea what happened to it?
answersonapostcard e2
10 12.7k 15 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 2:53PM
No idea Adrian, honestly.
AdrianTurner 10 350 Wales
20 Apr 2005 2:58PM
It's a weird and wonderful, mysterious world in which we live.
mdpontin 10 6.0k Scotland
20 Apr 2005 3:00PM
Perhaps the 3rd duck raised an objection?

Doug
Badger 12 4.7k 20 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 3:13PM
I deleted it, and apologise if I have done so incorrectly.

The actual thread had a title and a few full stops as the content of the initial post. On seeing the thread and content, I made a decision that:
a) it had no content
b) there didn't appear to be a purpose of the thread
c) the title was a statement with no support to show what that statement was.

Overall it gave no indication what the intention of the thread was.

Having seen other threads where the poster had edited the initial question to a few full stops and then posted a new thread under the same title a few minutes later, I assumed this was the case, so took the action to remove the thread. Had there been more content within the actual thread then I would have left it alone.

Matt
ejtumman 10 2.8k England
20 Apr 2005 3:16PM

Quote:Perhaps the 3rd duck raised an objection?


Looks like the 3rd Duck did!!! LOL

Quackers!!
answersonapostcard e2
10 12.7k 15 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 3:18PM
If moderators weren't quackers before they were moderators I think we are safely on the way now, I've got wrinkles since December 2004!
ejtumman 10 2.8k England
20 Apr 2005 3:20PM
LOL

Whens your tulip shot coming then?

;o)
Big Bri 13 15.7k United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 3:21PM
Don't apologise Matt. The only point in having power is to abuse it. Am I right ?


(btw, the correct answer here is "You're not wrong")



Wink
AdrianTurner 10 350 Wales
20 Apr 2005 3:21PM
Point taken Matt but the series of full stops where the continuation of the thread title as a lead in to the tag lines, I was interrupted by the telephone while posting, so posted as was, tried to edit literally a couple of minutes latter, and there it was, GONE!

Perhaps its all for the best, the idea seems a bit lame now anyway.

Adrian.
Badger 12 4.7k 20 United Kingdom
20 Apr 2005 3:22PM
Thanks Bri, I think!

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.