0

How have you wasted money on photography?

Forums > Photographic discussion > How have you wasted money on photography?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    Edgar
    6
    513 forum posts
    8 Oct 2006 - 8:54 AM
    0

    What item/s have you bought in relation to photography that have been an utter waste of money/time? I have a few but to start the ball rolling..

    I bought one of those camera supports that attach to car doors/windows. Used once worried I would break the car window. To much fiddling about...Now it is in my not used box.

    Please state item/s and why....This could help us avoid future waste,, although I doubt it.


    Edgar

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    8 Oct 2006 - 8:54 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    mrcal
    8
    1011 forum posts
    8 Oct 2006 - 9:08 AM
    0

    All of the poor quality lenses I bought, like the Soligor zoom I bought for my AE1some time in the early 80s. I'd have got better results without a lens at all.

    I used to think it better to have a cheap lens than no lens; not any more.

    raziel_uk
    8 Oct 2006 - 9:10 AM
    0

    Probably my two cameras! Nothing wrong with the cameras, they're great, it's the user that's rubbish and doesn't appear to have improved! :o)

    My Nikon F80.

    My film camera was a Minolta.

    When I went digital and bought Nikon I thought it would make sense to sell all my minolta film gear (good decision) and buy a Nikon film camera compatible with the lenses/flash for the digital gear.

    Used once!

    da_nige
    8 Oct 2006 - 11:15 AM
    0

    Fuji S602

    If I had known the 10D was only gonna be £1500 (expected it to be £2500 like the D60 and D30 were when first released) when it came out I would have waited instead spent £700 and dont like it at all. Still got it though and Dad uses it sometimes

    spaceman
    8 Oct 2006 - 11:18 AM
    0

    The only thing that springs to mind is a job lot of various filters that I bought about 10yrs ago. Half of them were of the wacky variety that nobody ever uses and the other half were grads which, considering I have no interest in landscapes, were pretty bloody useless. A moment of madness.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Oct 2006 - 12:03 PM
    0

    Effects filters too for me - when I was using film. Sold the lot of them in the end!

    Snapper
    8 Oct 2006 - 12:17 PM
    0

    A 5x4 enlarger that is actually too big for my house. Now if the seller had actually said it was the one with the extended column,I might have got a clue. Still hopeful that one day I'll get round to bolting it to the wall in my garage, and still a bargain compared to the money I wasted on the "brilliant" Epson 895 inkjet printer and all sorts of ink cartridges.

    mohikan22
    8 Oct 2006 - 12:19 PM
    0

    An Epson R300 printer. WHAT A PILE OF CR4P forever tweaking the colour profiles. black is never black on most images its greenish. not even sharp. never had a problem with my old lexar. never getting an epson again. period!>

    Just Jas
    8 Oct 2006 - 12:28 PM
    0

    I get a very good deep black from my HP815C until the colour cartridge starts to run out. Usually the yellow.

    In fact, I notice the effect on B&W prints slightly before I do on colour. I get a magenta caste on the B&W when this happens.

    jas

    Just Jas
    8 Oct 2006 - 4:48 PM
    0

    Perhaps I have spent too much money on new cameras when the old ones were working quite well. Whereas I could have spent the money on some real quality lenses.

    However, I have some nice pieces of kit now, which can cover a number of eventualities.

    And brings a ray of sunshine into an otherwise mundane existence.

    jas

    peterjones
    8 Oct 2006 - 8:41 PM
    0

    500mm Centon Mirror Lens and a Canon 70/300; both appallingly bad lenses.

    _
    _
    7
    530 forum posts Virgin Islands, British4 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Oct 2006 - 9:12 PM
    0

    Good question.

    Probably the biggest waste of money has been the switch from film to digital.
    Sure I take many more shots, but sales have remained roughly the same as they were in the days when I shot film.
    Now I don't think about a camera body as a one off expenditure it's just another consumable.

    John

    Just Jas
    8 Oct 2006 - 9:33 PM
    0


    Quote: Probably the biggest waste of money has been the switch from film to digital.

    Which what I was hinting at in my post above.

    Only I didn't want to start a war this time of night! Smile)

    jas

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Oct 2006 - 9:35 PM
    0

    If you had got the right lenses for your 300D Jas, you'd have stuck with digital.... I think! Wink

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.