Take your photography to the next level and beyond...

  • NEWS
  • REVIEWS
  • INSPIRATION
  • COMMUNITY
  • COMPETITIONS

Why not join for free today?

Join for Free

Your total photography experience starts here


PRIZES GALORE! Enter The ePHOTOzine Exclusive Christmas Prize Draw; Over £10,000 Worth of Prizes! Plus A Gift For Everybody On Christmas Day!

I prefer to get it right in camera


ade_mcfade e2
10 15.1k 216 England
12 May 2013 10:03AM
In less than 1000 words, describe your gut reaction to reading those words in a forum discussion
Wink

Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

AlanPerkins 9 484 England
12 May 2013 10:09AM
I spy a blue touch paper about to be lit Wink
JohnParminter 7 1.3k 14 England
12 May 2013 10:13AM
Flawed. One word is enough.

I prefer to get it right about 6 months to a year before I use the camera in research, vision, inspiration, commitment, planning and preparation.
tpfkapm 3 151 United Kingdom
12 May 2013 10:16AM
when?
LesJD 2 152 Wales
12 May 2013 10:17AM
I prefer to get it right in camera to make it easier to perfect in post.
pmorgan 8 217 13 England
12 May 2013 10:19AM
Presumably you want a few honest answers here as well Ade, as opposed to the hornets nest that you've just smashed open Wink

I like to get things as good as I can in camera, but I also enjoy the processing of my images just as much. Shooting in RAW as I do, a certain amount of work needs to be done in the "digital darkroom" just to process the shot to get it looking like the scene you initially captured. However, then comes the fun part, which is where I guess most "purists" get all out of shape, is the creative or artisitic side of taking things further and producing an image that has more mood or drama than the flat processed original had. At the end of the day it's all down to personal taste - you do things for yourself first and foremost, and if anyone else likes it, then that's a bonus.
cats_123 e2
10 4.3k 25 Northern Ireland
12 May 2013 10:25AM
No camera can replicate what the eye sees...and no one person will "see" the same picture, therefore, I would suggest that "get it right in camera" is not a phrase that is definable.

You can shoot the image to any setting you like and it may please you...but a RAW shot is the camera's interpretation of the settings (or even a mathematical equation based on the parameters programmed into the circuit board (Digital)) which leaves you to decide how you wan the end product to look. Smile
ade_mcfade e2
10 15.1k 216 England
12 May 2013 10:46AM
Its a bit like saying

"I prefer not crashing"

when referring to driving

or

"I prefer not stabbing myself in the eye with a fork"

when referring to eating

or

"I prefer hitting the right notes"

when referring to musicians playing tunes



It doesn't need to be said, ever, because it's axiomatic.

so my reaction is.... "what a t0sser" Wink
llareggub 4 756 United Kingdom
12 May 2013 10:47AM
I will avoid poking the bear, but I like to get it right in the camera too but my thoughts on that differ from the typical tirade offered by those that usually utter those words.

"Getting it right in the camera" to me means that I use the camera as a tool to produce a foundation of the final image that I want to produce, quite often that means that the RAW "product" direct from my camera looks relatively over exposed with a fairly neutral colour palatte, it is also quite often a little looser in the framing than the final image in order to enable me to make the final tweaks and produce the image I want to produce and not the image that the camera wants to produce.
Nick_w e2
7 4.1k 99 England
12 May 2013 10:59AM

Quote:In less than 1000 words, describe your gut reaction to reading those words in a forum discussion
Wink



One word would suffice Ade "B*****ks" Tongue

But to expand, if you would say optimise the image as best you can in camera, then I would agree, then use the digital darkroom to fine tune just as it was in film days, just as was / is used in a wet darkroom.

I would even say that for DMs as each element should be photographed to get the best out of it.

Why restrict yourself to a single tool it's like asking a painter to use only one brush.
Big Bri 13 15.7k United Kingdom
12 May 2013 11:01AM
Ade, what you said.

"I prefer to get it right in camera" - implying, that if the poster doesn't get it right, he/she throws it away?

When someone says that, it usually sounds like sour grapes to me - read "I'm crap at Photoshop".

Or perhaps it's a purist who believes that photographs should only ever represent what you actually saw, possibly aided by some grad filters, and that anything else is heresy.

??
Big Bri 13 15.7k United Kingdom
12 May 2013 11:02AM
Or an artist - "I prefer to finish a painting in one sitting"
scottishphototours 10 2.6k 2 Scotland
12 May 2013 11:08AM
I prefer to get it as right as possible in camera to reduce the time I have to sit at a computer mucking around with it afterwards. Simple.

But that's just me. I know that these days I'm in a minority...
Evertonian 1 545 England
12 May 2013 11:08AM
Nick gets it right with B******S.

'Getting it right in the camera' means getting the result that the camera's PC programmer prefers as the best option for those who cannot process it further.
kodachrome 3 530
12 May 2013 11:10AM
I see what you mean but 'getting it right in camera' can only be the base for further tweaking out side camera, unless you are pleased with the in camera results.

I often process RAW files in camera, but mostly PP out of camera. It depends if more PP/tweaks are required. Don't forget, that the final image will be subjective as good as it might be to your eyes.
I had these on going problems at my camera club competitions where you could never please all the judges all the time.

Sign In

You must be a member to leave a comment.

ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.

Join For Free

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.