Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I know, I know, I know, I'm a grumpy old git, but am I the only one on here that hates the intrusive apostrophe? People, plurals only need to have an S added unless there's a Y in there where you substitute ie for y. So tiger and tigers, partridge and partridges, irony and ironies. You only need an apostrophe if you are adding the s to denote the possessive. So "the tiger's prey," or "the partridges' dislike for snow," when there's more than one partridge. Its and it's break the rules of course. It's the tiger and its prey.
Oh dear, oh dear, next I'll be bellyaching about "I was sat," when you mean "I was sitting," or "I was stood," when you mean, "I was standing." To say, "I was sat," implies you were placed in that seat by someone. But then I lie down, I certainly only "Lay down" wine.
Grump, grump, grump.![]()
Alan
I was always taught the rule was "bung one if you feel like it, after all you can' always pretend its' just a mark where your pen slipped".
Quote: You seem in a buggers muddle to me.![]()
Or should that be bugger's muddle?
Add me to the Grumpy Old Gits Club. One of the English teachers at the school at which I work says "Mr Blokeh, English is an evolving language."
My reply to this is that there are some mutations that should be destroyed at birth.
One point I would add to your post, Alan, is that possessive "its" has no apostrophe.
Quote: I was always taught the rule was "bung one if you feel like it, after all you can' always pretend its' just a mark where your pen slipped".
Well maybe when you're using a ballpoint, but it doesn't work with a keyboard ![]()
Grumpy old git - me I mean.
Quote: Add me to the Grumpy Old Gits Club. One of the English teachers at the school at which I work says "Mr Blokeh, English is an evolving language."
My reply to this is that there are some mutations that should be destroyed at birth.
One point I would add to your post, Alan, is that possessive "its" has no apostrophe.
Quite agree in full it would be "It is the tiger and its prey." That's what I typed.
Alan
I quite agree,I also dislike apostrophised plurals..
There were some instances reported in the Press recently when certain local authorities decided to leave out apostrophes on certain street names, so, for example, St. James's Road became St. James Road.
Some say that we do not need apostrophes at all, but to denote the possessive,however, without them I would think that there might be problems in distinguishing singular and plural cases, as you suggest.
Similarly, with "sat" and" sitting,", "stood" and "standing", wrong usage simply sounds ugly..
I don't consider myself a "grumpy old git", but try to be open minded..however, I do bear in mind that one can be so open-minded that one's brains fall out.
I am (or: I'm, if you prefer) a member of epz in order to have my images assessed and critiqued, not the use or mis-use of apostrophes.
Try here instead.
Malc
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.




















