Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Legalities of photos during civil ceremonies ?

Forums > Event Photography > Legalities of photos during civil ceremonies ?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last
    peterjones
    peterjones (e2 Member)
    11
    3480 forum postspeterjones vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Dec 2011 - 10:20 AM
    0

    silly me Grin and I thought that weddings were just staged to provide photographic opportunities for me ...... Smile

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    13 Dec 2011 - 10:20 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    thewilliam
    13 Dec 2011 - 10:40 AM
    0

    When Lucian shoots a Scottish wedding, he should remember that the term "bonnie lassie" is now considered archaic and he should say "minger" instead. WinkWinkWink

    Last Modified By thewilliam at 13 Dec 2011 - 10:41 AM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39074 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Dec 2011 - 11:14 AM
    0

    As in any field of endeavour, it's all about building good relationships with people with whom you regularly work........... surely? Smile

    One feels the registrars, in Lucian's part of Scotland, must feel delighted when he arrives at a wedding! Grin

    keithh
    keithh (e2 Member)
    9
    21642 forum postskeithh vcard Wallis and Futuna23 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Dec 2011 - 2:40 PM
    0

    Maybe there's an opening for a Registrar/Photographer?

    A simple ROK helmet with mounted eye focus system should do the trick.

    Registrar's have in the past informed me that it's down to copyright as there are other names on the actual register as well as the B&G - seems more to be enforced in Wales than in England though.

    OldTom1
    6 Jan 2012 - 8:24 PM
    0

    I think this is strange as the photographer would be one of the main witnesses in a bigamy trial as he recorded the event 'live' but not the most important aspect (legally)of the signing of the legal document which is the main aspect of the ceremony.
    Church or registry office it does not matter you abide by the rules laid down by the official. I accept no flash during a church service (and civil) and most shots during that part of the album would be mono anyway as reportage shots. I take some reportage shots of the signing which I produce in mono. The formal set up ones would be colour. I think it is the disruption that would be caused setting up the formal shots as the register was being signed which is the problem, not taking shots during the signing.

    BigRick
    6 Jan 2012 - 10:40 PM
    0

    This is covered in the latest Photo pro magazine, and according to the officials they asked, there is NO legal reason that you cant take a photo of the actual register, and have pictures of the book being signed. It is personal preference of the person carrying out the service as to whether or not they allow pictures. A couple of stories in there about turning up at a wedding and being asked to stand at the back, with no photos of the ceremony etc.... and it even says at the end to take a copy of the article with you if anyone gets funny about photos.. lol. Smile

    Just Jas
    7 Jan 2012 - 12:17 PM
    0

    "I'm a professional fisherman - why can't I fish in your lake?"

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39074 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Jan 2012 - 1:19 PM
    0

    You are not on the public highway. So you have to obey any rules - however silly or bizarre they may seem to you.

    Simple as that really. Smile

    mipettin
    7 Jan 2012 - 11:49 PM
    0

    I raise this before the wedding with the couple and ask that they contact the registry office and make it known that they want professional photographs of the ceremony. I also let the couple know that I abide by the registrars rules as above I am not paid to battle with the registrar. However in Scotland in 7 years only come across one registrar who said no but backed down when the mother of the bride got involved Smile

    discreetphoton
    discreetphoton (Site Moderator)
    8
    3231 forum postsdiscreetphoton vcard United Kingdom20 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Jan 2012 - 11:01 AM
    0

    That seems key really. If the couple are expecting photos of the ceremony then it stands to reason that an official that won't allow them would not have got the booking, had the couple been aware in advance. So it's less about "the lake" as it is about the sensibilities of the person supervising it.

    CB pointed out that a wedding ceremony isn't a public highway. In some ways, it is: it's a public event from which the public may not be excluded.

    Last Modified By thewilliam at 8 Jan 2012 - 2:02 PM
    mikehit
    mikehit (e2 Member)
    3
    4599 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom5 Constructive Critique Points
    8 Jan 2012 - 3:02 PM
    0

    As I understand it the ceremony has to be in public so that members of the public can witness and have chance to object. The signing can be in private (it nearly always is in churches).

    trivets12
    8 Jan 2012 - 6:13 PM
    0

    I understood that the reason the actual signing may not be photographed is because the register itself is a legal document and the signatures upon it are legally binding in law, and must therefore not be copied or duplicated in any way. If I do shoot during the real signing, then I just make sure I am far enough away not to see the register page itself.
    Some vicars don't worry too much, but if the officiant (religious or civil ceremony) says you can't shoot, then you can't. Simples...

    BigRick
    8 Jan 2012 - 6:15 PM
    0


    Quote: I understood that the reason the actual signing may not be photographed is because the register itself is a legal document and the signatures upon it are legally binding in law, and must therefore not be copied or duplicated in any way. If I do shoot during the real signing, then I just make sure I am far enough away not to see the register page itself.
    Some vicars don't worry too much, but if the officiant (religious or civil ceremony) says you can't shoot, then you can't. Simples...

    Thats what i was told by a registrar, but as above, according to the article, it is public record, so makes no difference if you have a photo of it, as you can get a copy online.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.