Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I've been away for quite some time but just starting to get back into photography. I may even upload some photos soon and renew my e2.
I have recently replaced my 400D for a 60D and am looking at getting some better lenses.
With my 400D I had a Sigma 10 - 20, Sigma 24 - 70 2.8, Sigma 105mm macro, and a cheap Sigma 70 - 300.
My Sigma 24 - 70 recently had a little accident and is well and truly broken, so I am looking to find a suitable replacement, but would like to go down the Canon route. The Canon 24 - 70 2.8 is far too expensive for me to be able to justify to SWMBO, and I would like to be able to go a bit wider as well.
A colleague at work recommended the Canon 15 - 85 as thats what he uses on his 7D and he rates it highly, so I am leaning towards that currently. I don't think I'll miss the 2.8 as it was quite a heavy beast and the focussing was noisy, the 60D also handles low light much better than the 400D so I can up the ISO a bit, and with the IS on the lens that should help as well. I don't tend to shoot fast moving objects.
I am also planning on getting a 70 - 200 L f4 IS when funds permit.
I am thinking the 15 - 85 would be a good all round lens for the 60D, and along with a 70 - 200, should cover most things I need. I will keep the 10 - 20, and the 105 macro as I use both of them quite often.
Do you think the 15 - 85 would be a good choice for the money, or are there other lenses in a similar price range I should be considering. The assistant in the camera shop I was in recommended the 17 - 40L. I know it's an excellent lens, but I think I would forever be switching lenses to something else to get the 50 - 70mm range.
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
I have the 15-85. Excellent lens. Very sharp, superb range on a 60D, and very good IS. Highly recommended.
I can understand why you want something wider. I have a 7D, the 10-20 and the Canon 24-105 and swap between them. Most of the time it is ok, but if I am on holiday and switching between photographing the family and scenery/architecture it gets a bit tiresome.
The 15-85 would seem a good option. If you did want to stick with a 2.8 lens, and funds would stretch, you could also consider the canon 17-55 f2.8.
Not sure I would rule the 17-40 out though. Back in my pentax days my standard walkabout lens for a couple of years was a 16-45 I found that fine for most situations. It is probably the one I would go for, but then I do still plan to supplement my 7D with a full frame body at some point.
In that range on a APS-C camera my response is always get the 15-85 unless you find a reason not to, and if not try for the 24-105 but obviously would not be wide enough for your purposes at the ower end. The 17-40 is a good lens but I find the 40mm upper limit too restricting for general walkaround use.
The 70-200 f4LIS is an absolute dream to use.
Although you have all focal ranges covered with those 2 lenses, don't get obsessive about this: I have the 17-55 and 70-200 and don't miss anything with the 55-70 gap.
Have you considered the sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS? On my Canon 60D its an excellent lens. Seems to work better than it did on my previous 30D. Tack sharp, especially when stopped down a little.
I don''t know anything about the Canon 15-85 but it might be a good idea to go to your local camera shop and compare the lenses. TBH you probably won't go wrong with either.
The 24 - 104 f4 L is another lens I have been looking at. I quite like the idea of getting an L series lens as it is more weatherproof, it will also give me a bit more length, which would be useful. It comes down to whether I can live with 24mm being the widest it will go. It seems whatever I buy will be a compromise somewhere, it's just which compromise I can live with more. I wish I was better at making decisions.
A vote for the 17-40L. I bought mine 2nd hand many moons ago - its still the lens I use for 90%+ of my photography, and it hasn't missed a beat. So far its outlasted 2 bodies... Its a fabulous lens.
I don't rue the gap between 40-70mm personally, but then again I use a full frame sensor. I would think the effective gap between 64-112mm (when the crop factor is added) would be more problematic.
The 15-85 is the first lens I would replace if the whole kit was stolen. Superb lens and so versatile, the majority of my images are taken with it. I've also dived in and got the 70-200 f4 when I need any extra reach, and I've got the Sigma 10-20 for the extra at the other end.
Quote: The 24 - 104 f4 L is another lens I have been looking at. I quite like the idea of getting an L series lens as it is more weatherproof, it will also give me a bit more length,
The extra 9mm at the short end of the 15-85 counts for a lot more than the missing 20mm at the long end, IMO. There's a lot of difference between 15 and 24mm, and not much between 85 and 105.
Thanks all, I think you have confirmed that the 15-85 is probably the way to go. As its a bit cheaper it might also allow me to stretch to the 70-300L
Just a small spanner to throw, I had a 17-85 but really really loved the 24-105 I got instead super lens. F4 throughout and nice IS. I also have sigma 10-20 and 70-300.
I do acknowledge that the 15-85 gets great reviews as does the 17-55.
Can you borrow/rent one to see?
Another vote for the 15-85. I have had mine for a few months, I had a 17-85 for a year or two but felt as though it needed replacing. I bought a 17-70 sigma which I was happy with. However I was offered a good deal on it against the 15-85.
I am very happy with it on the 60d.
I still haven't fully decided. I have a mate who has the 15 - 85, just not sure he would lend it to me. I don't know anyone with the 24 - 105, although I don't really need to try one of them out, I know the image quality will be good, it's just that gap.
I have had a 24 - 70 for the last 6 years though and managed fine not being able to get wider. Decisions, decisions.
I have just bought the 70 - 300 though, so at least that is one decision I have made.
I am leaning again towards the 24 - 105L, as
1. It's an L series lens with the associated build quality and weatherproofing.
2. I have never really had a problem with not being able to go wider than 24mm
3. I may one day in the future go Full Frame, in which case it would be a brilliant range lens, and adding the 17 - 40L in as a wide angle on a Full frame would make a nice set of lenses, whereas the EF-S 15 - 85 won't be any use at all on a full frame.
Buy the lens you need now, not the one you may need if you buy a new camera. Websites are littered with people who have been buying EF lenses (or FX for Nikon) 'just in case' they buy a full frame camera - and they are still waiting many years later. Even if you do go full frame, Canon lenses hold their value pretty well.
Everything I've read suggests that the 15-85 and 24-105 are very close in image quality and size, so what else is there?.
Focal range - wider or longer? Cropping the 15-85 image will go some way toimitating the upper focal range of the 24-105, but you can't 'widen' a shot to make the 24-105 act like a 15-85 at the wide end. You mentioned in your OP that you wanted 'something wider' (then contradict your self later on)
Weather sealing - the 15-85 will manage with showers, so how bad will the weather be when you take it out?
IS - better on the 15-85
Aperture - how often do you shoot wide open at f4?
Build quality - many comments say the 15-85 is well built. Even though it is not up to L standard, how badly will you be treating it? Remember 'L' category is meant to withstand heavy pro use.
Choose your compromises.
You've made me see sense, I think I was being a bit blinded by the lust for the L series Red Ring, but now I've just bought the L Series 70 - 300 hopefully that craving is satisfied for a while.
You are right, I do want to be able to go a bit wider than the 24 - 105 will let me, so the 15 - 85 is the obvious choice. I don't need the extra length either as I can use the 70 - 300 for that range.
The 15 - 85 makes sense in so many ways, if I ever do change camera, as you say, I can always sell it.
Thanks to everyone for your input, it has really helped me decide what I really do and don't need out of a lens, the red ring around the outside will not be visible in any of my photos so is not necessary.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar