Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
I am thinking about hiring the canon 400mm f2.8 IS to take some good wild bird shots at a local feeding station.I can get within 5 meters of the birds due to the location of the hide but would like to know if this lens is long enough to get good size images of bullfinches,blue tits ect.Would a 1.4 converter be needed?
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
If you can afford it hire a converter also.
Then you can take pictures with and without to see which you like best!
I use a 70 - 300 mm lens on Nikon F-60 for photographing wild birds in various places and find this not to bad. From the pictures that are taken, if there is to much back ground Ienlarge and crop to the subject.
What about the Sigma 170-500mm zoom? That's supposed to be superb for this sort of photography.
The 400 lens alone should be enough... if you are not close enough then, your results may not be what you want anyway. Along with magnification also comes loss of depth. Intricate feather details will blend into each other. Sure they will be great shots, but the guy who posted that he shoots with a 70-300 will probably have sharper images.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar