0

Lenses for architectural photography

Forums > Lenses > Lenses for architectural photography

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Hi,

    I shoot landscape and architecture and am looking to upgrade my camera to a 5D MK II and also my lenses. I am tempted by the 28-105mm L series because of its quality and zoom range (a good general purpose walk around lens). However, there appears to be more barrel distortion at 24mm than the 24-70mm.

    Does anyone use this lens and shoot architecture?

    Is the distortion simple to correct in PS?

    I would also like a wider lens, and a larger telephoto (for detail shots), 200mm or possibly 300mm. But the expense of the upgrade is obviously expensive, thus, I wanted to get as close I could get to an all round lens in the beginning.

    Also, does anyone shoot architecture professionally and not use a Tilt and Shift lens? I ask, as I have recently seen some very well executed perspective correction on PS.

    Thanks in advance for your advice

    Phil

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    12 Apr 2010 - 3:54 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    12 Apr 2010 - 4:02 PM
    0

    I'd recommend the 17-40 as a good starting point for architecture

    It's mid-priced (i.e. bloody expensive thanks to the weak pound), very sharp, little distortion and very very wide on the 5D body.

    Take a look at my portfolio - just about every shot of a building in the last 3 years was taken with that lens on a Canon 5D.

    I sell my architecture shots and don't use a TS-E lens (yet) - there are ways of minimising perspective problems and with Photoshop you can use perspective and skew and guide lines to try to square things up.

    The 17mm TS-E would be ideal for me as I do city work where you are constrained for space and need the wide lens - though the 24mm may be ok for your needs.

    thewilliam
    12 Apr 2010 - 5:27 PM
    0

    Nikon and Canon both do tilt and shift lenses that seem to be standard kit for the architectural snappers. Many professionals prefer to get it right in camera.

    Dave_Canon
    12 Apr 2010 - 7:14 PM
    0

    I have not noticed any significant barrel distortion in the 24-105 but this is easily corrected. However, 24mm is not wide enough for much architecture. I used a Canon 10-22mm on my 20D and considered the Canon 16-35mm or my full frame but for various reasons bought a Sigma 12-24mm for the full frame. I have been pleased with the architectural shots so far. If money was no object, I would certainly buy a Canon Tilt and Shift lens.

    Dave

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    14 Apr 2010 - 2:04 PM
    0

    If you're serious about architectureal photography, have a look at this....

    I don't think that includes the digital back either... we're talking serious money

    conrad
    conrad (e2 Member)
    7
    10570 forum postsconrad vcard Netherlands112 Constructive Critique Points
    14 Apr 2010 - 2:19 PM
    0


    Quote: we're talking serious money

    And when someone on here says that, it means re-mortgaging your house or something on that level, LOL!

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    14 Apr 2010 - 2:48 PM
    0

    exactly - how much would a 5 by 4 inch digital back cost??

    add that on to the $7700 for the body

    oh and then some lenses...

    really is going to be the price of a new Beamer!

    Wow, Ade that certainly is expensive, and without the back! I was thinking of buying the 17-40mm as you suggested. How is the corner sharpness?, and is there much barrel distortion?

    Also, can you or anyone recommend a mid range zoom suitable for capturing architectural details? I want to cover all the focal lengths, can someone recommend an essential lens kit?

    Thanks again

    Agree with Ade; the 17-40 is what I use too. Any distortion is easily corrected in PS. It's also worth remembering that you can always use it at the 40mm end to reduce distortion and stich a few shots into a pano.

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    14 Apr 2010 - 9:57 PM
    0

    very low distortion - very sharp

    that's why I recommended it Wink

    Kris_Dutson
    14 Apr 2010 - 10:17 PM
    0

    I know, maybe I should've been more specific and said wide angle distortion i.e. converging verticals and all that malarky. Smile

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    15 Apr 2010 - 12:53 PM
    0

    ah yeah - if you point the camera up, you'll get al lthe builkdings leaning in like the Shambles in York!

    one tip...

    shot portrait and get your centre spot on the pavement to minimise converging verticals

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    9
    35381 forum postsCarabosse vcard England268 Constructive Critique Points
    15 Apr 2010 - 1:11 PM
    0

    17-40L + correction of vertical convergence in PS is the simplest way, I have found.

    ade_mcfade
    ade_mcfade (Critique Team)
    8
    12726 forum postsade_mcfade vcard England212 Constructive Critique Points
    15 Apr 2010 - 1:17 PM
    0

    I agree - though the more you minimise distrotion in PS by keeping the lens as level as possible, the more believeable the final result will be.

    Extreme distorion corrections can look really odd, and you can end up with straight lines bending which causes a right head ache, you end up doing all sorts of stuff to try to rectify that!

    I've found the warp tool quite useful if it's not possible to get it right in camera.Smile

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.