0

Lightroom or Photoshop CS5

Forums > Digital imaging > Lightroom or Photoshop CS5

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last
    StrayCat
    18 Mar 2011 - 6:18 AM
    0

    I am posting a link to an article on this topic. This is a question I'm asking myself, and if you read the article I link to, your comments would be appreciated.

    Lightroom or CS5

    Last Modified By StrayCat at 18 Mar 2011 - 6:19 AM
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    18 Mar 2011 - 6:18 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Nick_w
    Nick_w (e2 Member)
    5
    2739 forum postsNick_w vcard England62 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 8:21 AM
    0

    If it's one or the other Denny then CS5 as it can do more. You have ACR 6 which is the same basic RAW converter as lightroom, although not as intuitive.

    witchcraft
    18 Mar 2011 - 9:49 AM
    0

    Aperture Smile

    cameracat
    cameracat (e2 Member)
    8
    8160 forum postscameracat vcard Norfolk Island60 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 10:21 AM
    0

    Agree entirely with Nick.....Smile

    If you have to choose between one or the other Photoshop will do a lot more, Lightroom 3 does quite a bit and if you don't plan changing the original images that much its a good program.

    Lightroom also offers a really good cataloging system, That said the Bridge partner to Photoshop can do a lot of that.

    At the end of the day, Its down to what sort of use your gonna put it too, Or how much you wanna spend, Some use both PS/CS & LR versions alongside each other....!!!


    Quote: Aperture

    LOL.....Yeah! Thats great if you want to confine yourself to a particular operating system....Grin

    Have they managed to get it working without crashing these days....Wink Last I heard PS/CS5 was proving a problem for the Apple OS, As indeed was " Adobes Flash Player "....!!!

    Tisk tisk.....Perhaps more time ironing out the bugs in the software, Rather than to much time inventing the latest new must have " Toy ".....Tongue

    Wink

    Last Modified By cameracat at 18 Mar 2011 - 10:22 AM
    chavender
    chavender (e2 Member)
    1
    138 forum postschavender vcard France1 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 11:06 AM
    0

    For me Lightroom is more intuitive in use. CS5 whilst being a very powerful tool attempts to be "all things to all men" and for me has become over compicated
    These days I find that most of the time I can do all I need in lightroom 3 with elements 9 for more "complex" adjustments, cloning, selections etc.
    Normally I just need to tweak the RAW file, crop a bit and do a bit of dodging and burning in Lightroom. The image management within lightroom is also very fast and powerful.
    In short, for me I need both.

    photodigg
    18 Mar 2011 - 11:28 AM
    0

    Capture NX2

    Nick_w
    Nick_w (e2 Member)
    5
    2739 forum postsNick_w vcard England62 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 5:20 PM
    0

    NX2 is a brilliant RAW converter unfortunately it's the most unstable software I've used in years even on 64bit machine with vista and 4GB of memory.
    To expand on my first post. CS5 can do everything lightroom can.

    LR can't do everything CS5 can. Although LR is easier to use to convert RAW.

    Last Modified By Nick_w at 18 Mar 2011 - 5:22 PM
    StrayCat
    18 Mar 2011 - 7:12 PM
    0

    I've used both; but I came back to Elements, which I've been using since the first release. I don't do a lot of manipulation these days, not like I used to, I guess the novelty wears off for some of us. I just want to produce good images; I haven't done much RAW before, so I'll try a bit, see what happens.

    What about BreezeBrowser Pro, anyone using that?

    Chris_L
    18 Mar 2011 - 7:39 PM
    0

    I've stopped using BreezeBrowser Pro. It used to be the first thing I'd use to look at my images. The HQ Preview is fab on JPEGs, better than Faststone etc. It generates web galleries, good batch renaming etc etc. It was one of the first shareware programs I ever bought back in 2005 or so. I never used it for raw conversion though, I'd preview files in it then transfer the pick of them to Photoshop.

    I'd probably still use it if it wasn't for two things, I only shoot raw now and I love the way Canon DPP handles the files.

    You could sell your Nikon and buy a Canon in order to use DPP but if not then if I were you I'd concentrate on Lightroom it flies through raw files faster than Photoshop, watch a few Lightroom tutorial and workflow videos.

    lobsterboy
    lobsterboy (Site Moderator)
    8
    12463 forum postslobsterboy vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 7:45 PM
    0


    Quote: I've stopped using BreezeBrowser Pro. It used to be the first thing I'd use to look at my images.

    Same here - I do it all in Lightroom now Wink

    StrayCat
    18 Mar 2011 - 8:04 PM
    0

    I sold my Nikon a couple of years ago; just got a Canon 40D. Where can I get DPP, and what does it stand for?

    Last Modified By StrayCat at 18 Mar 2011 - 8:05 PM
    Chris_L
    18 Mar 2011 - 8:11 PM
    0

    Did you get any discs with your 40D? Look for one that says Digital Photo Professional. Then upgrade to the newest version (very improved in recent months). I'm using version v3.9.0.2. I started using it for Black and White (which it's fab for see my link here) now I use it for all raw instead of LR or PS.

    StrayCat
    18 Mar 2011 - 8:59 PM
    0

    Thanks Chris, excellent site. No, I didn't get a CD, bought it used.Tongue

    CathyT
    CathyT (e2 Member)
    6
    7023 forum postsCathyT vcard United Kingdom18 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 9:06 PM
    0

    Phase One...Capture One 5........am I the only one??

    JJGEE
    7
    4648 forum posts England17 Constructive Critique Points
    18 Mar 2011 - 11:02 PM
    0

    Never used most of the features in Elements, so CS would be far too fully featured for my usage.

    I found Lightroom easier to learn / use and liked the fact one could just close it down and re-open later and everything you had done ( history) was still there, unlike Elements.

    I have also started using Aperture, which is even easier to use than Lightroom, but missing some useful features that Lightroom has. So if you have an Apple computer system then Aperture / Lightroom combination would be my recommendation for general photographic usage.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.