0

Lomography cameras

Forums > Film cameras > Lomography cameras

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last
    cats_123
    cats_123 (e2 Member)
    8
    2749 forum postscats_123 vcard Northern Ireland16 Constructive Critique Points
    2 Aug 2010 - 10:05 AM
    0

    I don't particularly want to join the `Film Group' but some members may be interested in these `Lomography' cameras on sale in `Urban Outfitters'? Smile
    Urban Outfitters

    Have no idea whether they are expensive or good value for money.......

    This is the online shop, but they were selling some models in shop (Belfast) for £50 Smile

    Last Modified By cats_123 at 2 Aug 2010 - 10:10 AM
    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    2 Aug 2010 - 10:05 AM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    cameracat
    cameracat (e2 Member)
    8
    8160 forum postscameracat vcard Norfolk Island60 Constructive Critique Points
    2 Aug 2010 - 11:13 AM
    0

    They can't be serious......Grin

    There are easier ways of wasting perfectly good rolls of film......Smile

    If you want to try and emulate " LomoStylee " take a spare bodycap for your DSLR, Drill a hole in the middle of it, Place it on your camera and set up for " Manual " mode.

    Ignore what the meter tells you by a stop or two, Plus or minus, Depending on your taste.....Smile Then go take some piccies.....!!!

    If you want to get all arty & fancy, Put some clear plastic over the hole in the body cap, Cellotape can be quite interesting.....Smile

    Job Done without wasting film and spending a fortune to have it developed.

    Options are keep it in colour or turn it mono, Whatever looks worse.

    Wink

    Last Modified By cameracat at 2 Aug 2010 - 11:15 AM

    For the cost of a cheap plastic camera, including the lenses, I'd sooner go to ebay and buy a TLR, for example a Yashicamat, and end up with a well made camera, with amazing lenses and look at some quality photographs taken with a quality camera.

    Lomo? That can go where the sun don't shine.

    Dave

    Last Modified By User_Removed at 2 Aug 2010 - 11:16 AM
    cameracat
    cameracat (e2 Member)
    8
    8160 forum postscameracat vcard Norfolk Island60 Constructive Critique Points
    2 Aug 2010 - 11:17 AM
    0


    Quote: Lomo? That can go where the sun don't shine

    I quite agree, But you do need a little light, Perhaps bung a torch in there with it......Smile

    Yup, I can see Susan Burnstine wastes a lot of film with her crap cameras. :o/


    Quote: and end up with a well made camera, with amazing lenses

    Well made doesn't mean used well.


    To cats 123 (OP) - yes, they are expensive. A lot of users agree that they are expensive when you don't have one but worth every penny when you do.
    .

    Last Modified By gringoninjo at 7 Aug 2010 - 2:02 PM

    Buying a Lomo won't get you a Burnstine portfolio.
    If you do have the ability, I don't think you need a Lomo to achieve the style.

    The problem some of us have with Lomo is the philosophy behind it - often people extol them as being cheap and basic, when actually we know we can get basic cameras really cheaply, and Lomo are actually expensive for what they are. And then often people assume the rubbish photos they've produced are artistic because they're Lomo.
    So you get a knee jerk reaction - those of us who really do use low cost basic equipment are pretty fed up with hearing about Lomo.

    That doesn't mean no-one does good work with them. But there seem to be an awful lot of people who think that if you buy overpriced junk you'll automatically get artistic photography.

    I suppose if someone wanted a brand new smart looking basic camera in a nice box, its their money, their choice. Its really the pretence that its cheap thats annoying.

    grumble grumble grumble grumble


    btw Burnstine was worth a look, thanks for the link

    I read further about Burnstine -


    Quote: I created twenty-one hand-made film cameras and lenses


    Quote: The cameras are primarily made out of plastic, vintage camera parts and random household objects and the single element lenses are molded out of plastic and rubber

    Not Lomo then.


    Quote: Yup, I can see Susan Burnstine wastes a lot of film with her crap cameras. :o/

    and end up with a well made camera, with amazing lenses

    Well made doesn't mean used well.


    To cats 123 (OP) - yes, they are expensive. A lot of users agree that they are expensive when you don't have one but worth every penny when you do.
    .

    I'm not sure i understand what you mean by that. Are you inferring something? The Yashica was the classic wedding camera of the 70's even today a 2 1/4 medium format takes some beating. The yashica was well made and well used.

    Dave

    No, not personally inferring, it's a matter of people looking down on toy cameras and judging them against the likes of Yashicamat and Bronica.
    The toy (I agree with keith selmes - lets not call it Lomo, please) camera is a tool that shouldn't be compared to any other type. It's like comparing an axe to a saw.


    Quote: (with regards to Burnstine's work)

    Not Lomo then

    'Lomo' has become the fashionable name for Toy in the same way that Boots is used more than chemist, so you say tomato....

    Yes, Toy cameras can be used for artsy photos, but also for regular out-and-about stuff, too. But all of you so far seem to be concerned with the crap that's curned out, the same kind of crap that can be churned out with any camera. You got to admit, it kinda seems like snobbery.

    Last Modified By gringoninjo at 7 Aug 2010 - 5:26 PM
    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
    11
    8606 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Aug 2010 - 5:36 PM
    0


    Quote: They can't be serious......Grin

    There are easier ways of wasting perfectly good rolls of film......Smile

    There fun to use Smile

    I have never looked down on cameras of any description. One of my favourite quotes is : There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs.

    I feel this particularly when some users of "better known" brands infer that in some way their equipment is better. My only question has only ever been "better than what?"

    However, I look at the cheap cameras with stupid price tags, labeled "lomo" and think how stupid it is. Face it, so many of the are cheap and nasty.

    I guess, having looked at your profile that your main interest could be labelled, and i don't like labels, as niche, in the mainstream view of things. I don't know, its not something that i have ever taken much interest in it myself.

    Whatever floats folks' boats.

    Dave

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (Challenge Team)
    11
    8606 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Aug 2010 - 9:09 PM
    0


    Quote: I guess, having looked at your profile that your main interest could be labelled, and i don't like labels, as niche, in the mainstream view of things. I don't know, its not something that i have ever taken much interest in it myself

    Who me ? Smile


    Quote: I guess, having looked at your profile that your main interest could be labelled, and i don't like labels, as niche, in the mainstream view of things. I don't know, its not something that i have ever taken much interest in it myself

    Who me ? Smile

    No, not you Smile

    Fishnet
    Fishnet (e2 Member)
    7
    4779 forum postsFishnet vcard United Kingdom5 Constructive Critique Points
    7 Aug 2010 - 10:44 PM
    0

    I have a proper Lomo camera, not one of those toy ones in the OP and I love it and used well can produce some very lovely photos.

    Whatever anyone likes. Just do it.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.