Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Looking to purchase a 5D. Good or bad?

Forums > Digital cameras > Looking to purchase a 5D. Good or bad?

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 | Next · Last
    Kris_Dutson
    16 Apr 2007 - 3:14 PM
    0

    I suppose a 16-400 f2.8 L USM IS is hoping a bit....even if I had won the lottery. Wink

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    16 Apr 2007 - 3:14 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    tigerminx
    16 Apr 2007 - 4:11 PM
    0

    Lol, that's pushing it a bit Smile

    CB, I think you're right. Maybe I should dive into the pool so to speak. I already have a buyer for my EF-S 10-22mm, so it makes the transition a lot easier. I will definitely let you know.

    Thanks again all.
    Bruce.

    andytvcams
    16 Apr 2007 - 4:16 PM
    0


    Quote: There were some glitches with early models of the 5D, which have now been fixed

    What glitches?.

    strawman
    strawman (e2 Member)
    9
    21900 forum postsstrawman vcard United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
    16 Apr 2007 - 4:36 PM
    0


    Quote: If Canon ever bring out a 28-135 (or thereabouts) L lens, I could be tempted!

    I believe the 24-105 is the result CB.

    I like the 5d but it is the cost of supporting lenses that puts me off. I worked out that even with the current cash backs it will cost me nearly £3,500 to get 5D and L glass to the same range of focal length coverage. lenses

    17-40L
    24-105L
    100-400L
    1.4x TC

    I could restrict myself to the 1st two lenses for the 5D and keep my 300D plus 55-200 and 170-500 for wildlife/sports, but theny why bother upgrading. I know I am moaning Smile

    Last Modified By Dave at 16 Apr 2007 - 5:03 PM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39064 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    16 Apr 2007 - 6:19 PM
    0


    Quote: I believe the 24-105 is the result CB.

    Not an entirely satisfactory result. It is not as good at 24mm as the 17-40L is at 17mm!

    I would rather have a less ambitious wide end and a longer top end. Even a 35-135 or 35-150 would be fine (given I already have the 17-40) and would, hopefully, achieve more consistent quality throughout the range.

    The 24-70L is too heavy, too expensive and too limited in range. Also, if one listens to the whiners on DPR and Fred Miranda Wink the QC on the 24-70L is questionable, with many having to be repeatedly returned for replacement.

    So far as I am concerned there isn't a totally satisfactory mid-range zoom for FF digi at the moment. I'm happy enough to wait until one comes out! Smile

    Last Modified By Dave at 16 Apr 2007 - 6:22 PM
    ahollowa
    16 Apr 2007 - 8:20 PM
    0

    I have had mine for about 2 weeks (bought just before the rebate but was £20 less than with the rebate (kit with 24-105) as whe put their prices up by £150 when the £130 rebate started!!!
    It replaced my 10D and is streets ahead. I think that compared to some of the later models the differences wouldn't be as great. My main issue with the 10D was the lack of a good Canon 17-85 lens to fit it. I needed to upgrade body and lens to get the lens coverage I wanted and this bought the price differential closer (until I decided to get the 24-105 as well but at £1950 it was such a bargan I couldn't resist especially as I don't have to pay for a year!!).

    cheers

    Al.

    andytvcams
    17 Apr 2007 - 12:20 AM
    0

    I'm still waiting for a reply CB?.

    Big Bri
    12
    15309 forum posts England
    17 Apr 2007 - 12:25 AM
    0

    Andy, I have a really early model 5D and it has a major glitch. When I'm hungover and knackered, it won't go out at sunrise and get nice photos for me.

    Wink

    Big Bri
    12
    15309 forum posts England
    17 Apr 2007 - 12:29 AM
    0


    Quote: The 24-70L is too heavy, too expensive and too limited in range. Also, if one listens to the whiners on DPR and Fred Miranda the QC on the 24-70L is questionable, with many having to be repeatedly returned for replacement

    Sorry, but DPR and FM must talk complete bollocks. The 24-70L is unquestionably the dogs gonads of lenses.
    And if it's too heavy, you're a wimp.

    John, I have the following for my 5D:
    17-40L
    24-70L
    70-200L (F4 Sad )
    100-400L
    100 macro
    50mm f1.8
    (all the other lenses stay in the museum now)

    Was it expensive ? Well, my I sold my third child for medical experimentation.......

    Wink

    Go on, buy one.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39064 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 12:46 AM
    0


    Quote: I'm still waiting for a reply CB?.

    Sorry - you'll have to ask those on here who had to return their 5D's in the early days after launch. Certainly 2 or 3 on here (Abwhitt springs to mind... can't remember the others).

    And a horde of others on DPR......needless to say! ;-D


    Quote: The 24-70L is unquestionably the dogs gonads of lenses

    Well, it can just about match a 50mm/f1.4 - but only just. And I already have that in my collection! Wink

    Oh and it weighs more than the bloody 5D !

    No thanks - you can keep the 24-70L. My lightweight - and two stops faster - prime does it for me! Wink

    mattw
    mattw (e2 Member)
    9
    5189 forum postsmattw vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 5:10 AM
    0


    Quote: ....................... I'm going out with my 5D this afternoon to give it a proper road test!

    THUD!!!!

    Is this a strange v4 problem, or did CB really say that????

    keithh
    keithh (e2 Member)
    9
    21639 forum postskeithh vcard Wallis and Futuna23 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 7:26 AM
    0

    Oh I'm sure there'll be reference soon to some acquaintance offering him a king's ransom for a tired old 20D that he just couldn't refuse. That's the usual route to a U Turn.
    Wink

    mattw
    mattw (e2 Member)
    9
    5189 forum postsmattw vcard United Kingdom10 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 8:39 AM
    0

    I wonder if the 5D has suddenly become the best thing since sliced bread?

    keithh
    keithh (e2 Member)
    9
    21639 forum postskeithh vcard Wallis and Futuna23 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 8:47 AM
    0

    I doubt it, 'cos there's no future in 35mm sensors

    strawman
    strawman (e2 Member)
    9
    21900 forum postsstrawman vcard United Kingdom16 Constructive Critique Points
    17 Apr 2007 - 8:51 AM
    0


    Quote: I wonder if the 5D has suddenly become the best thing since sliced bread?

    Nah the Pannini has that slot Wink

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.