Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Macro and wide angle lens

Forums > Lenses > Macro and wide angle lens

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Hi, I am seeking some advice on lens! I am getting quite confused with what to buy as I am quite new to DSLR. I have the cannon 550d and would like to purchase as cheaply as possible a macro and wide angle lens. All advice would be really helpful to me.

    Thanks Lisa

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    2 Aug 2011 - 10:14 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Did you get an 18-55 lens with the camera? That's fairly wide. There's not many options that are wider and cheap. You need to look at something like the Sigma 10-20. As for macro consider the Sigma 105 if that's too expensive then consider the cheap and cheerful Sigma 75-300, or to use existing lenses for macro photography try buying some extension tubes (Canon are expensive but Kenko and Jessops ones aren't)

    Last Modified By User_Removed at 2 Aug 2011 - 10:55 PM
    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    sherlob
    sherlob (e2 Member)
    7
    1993 forum postssherlob vcard United Kingdom116 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 12:30 AM
    0

    An indication of budget would be useful!

    Personally, I think the 105 Sigma maybe quite difficult to use on a cropped sensor body - the focal length would be nearer 170mm. I seem to recall that sigma brought out a 70mm version of their macro lens which you may find easier to use. I agree with Chris re: the wide angle route. Be cautious if going for a telephoto lens as the macro feature isn't a true macro, but more of a sales pitch. Again I agree that extension tubes may be a cheaper way into the macro market.

    Adam

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful

    Thanks Chris, Adam. I do have the 18-55 lens and the 70-300 telephoto macro. I did get set-up rings and 10* lens but I was very disappointed I got much better effects with the 70-300 lens. I will look into extension tubes. My budget for a macro lens would have been about £200!

    Thanks Lisa

    adrian_w
    adrian_w (e2 Member)
    5
    2939 forum postsadrian_w vcard Scotland4 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 9:27 AM
    0

    You could try for a 2nd hand 100mm Canon macro, would probably cost around £150-200.
    It is an excellent lens even on a crop sensor, ideal for creepy crawleys & good for non moving items as well.
    if you only want it for static shots ( flowers etc) the 60mm macro is another option.

    cambirder
    3 Aug 2011 - 9:34 AM
    0


    Quote: would probably cost around £150-200

    You would be lucky to find one under £300.

    Thank you adrian, cambirder, I will take a look and see what I come up with! Most of my shots are macro...

    conrad
    conrad (e2 Member)
    8
    10705 forum postsconrad vcard 113 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 4:22 PM
    0

    I beg to differ with Adam - I've used a Sigma 105mm on a crop camera, and it was a joy to use.

    The advantage of using a third party lens instead of one from Canon itself, is that you can usually make the purchase on a smaller budget.

    The same goes for wide angle. If you do indeed require a lens wider than the 18-55 that probably came with your camera, a Sigma 10-22mm or Tokina 11-16mm is cheaper than a Canon 10-20mm, and the quality is very high.

    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    Ade_Osman
    Ade_Osman (e2 Member)
    10
    3921 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England31 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 4:25 PM
    0

    You might be better off looking for a Tamron 90mm Sp Di Macro, it's a good trade off between the lenses so far mentioned and on top of that, I personally think it's better than the Sigma 105mm having had both of them. But horses for courses spring to mind, I can tell you this much the Tamron is rarely of the front of my camera and it's cheaper than the other options mentioned here.

    Ade

    Last Modified By Ade_Osman at 3 Aug 2011 - 4:26 PM
    Helpful Post! This post was flagged as helpful
    colin beeley
    colin beeley (e2 Member)
    10
    887 forum postscolin beeley vcard England7 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 5:45 PM
    0

    look here for one of those Wink

    Paul Morgan
    Paul Morgan (e2 Member)
    12
    12310 forum postsPaul Morgan vcard England6 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 6:01 PM
    0

    Since when has a 90mm been a wide angle.

    cambirder
    3 Aug 2011 - 6:21 PM
    0

    I think the OP was looking for one of each.

    Ade_Osman
    Ade_Osman (e2 Member)
    10
    3921 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England31 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Aug 2011 - 8:19 PM
    0

    No need to be pedantic Paul Tongue

    Ade

    Thank you so much for your suggestions and help as it was really needed I can now go and seek out a macro lens Smile

    Thanks for the link colin Smile

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.