Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Macro Lenses

Forums > Lenses > Macro Lenses

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 | Next · Last
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39075 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 1:42 PM
    0


    Quote: it is impossible for it to be double, its just that the M4/3 sensor sees less of the projected image...

    Agreed but the "magnification" effect is the same.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    27 Jul 2012 - 1:42 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Philh04
    27 Jul 2012 - 1:51 PM
    0


    Quote: it is impossible for it to be double, its just that the M4/3 sensor sees less of the projected image...

    Agreed but the "magnification" effect is the same.

    LoLTongue But there is no 'magnification', you are right it is just a visual effect you are just seeing a section of the whole, it would make my job a lot easier if a smaller sensor did in fact increase magnification...

    Seems Ade's thread has been a little highjacked... Smile

    Phil

    Last Modified By Philh04 at 27 Jul 2012 - 1:52 PM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39075 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 1:58 PM
    0

    So you would agree that a macro lens which, at closest focus, provides a life-size image on FF will produce double life size on a 2.0 crop sensor? Smile

    oldblokeh
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:06 PM
    0


    Quote: So you would agree that a macro lens which, at closest focus, provides a life-size image on FF will produce double life size on a 2.0 crop sensor? Smile

    Only in a parallel universe with different laws of geometry. Tongue

    Philh04
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:12 PM
    0

    I want to go to this parallel universe Wink

    We all know that it will be 4x lifesize Tongue I am currently working at between 30 to 40x magnification it would make it so much easier if a smaller sensor increased the mag...

    Cheers

    Phil

    Pete
    Pete (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    12
    18230 forum postsPete vcard ePz Advertiser England95 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:28 PM
    0

    I've created a quick illustration - does this help?
    sensor-magnification.jpg
    There is no magnification increase when using a different sized sensor, just a crop factor
    Then when the photo is viewed it's magnified.

    Last Modified By Pete at 27 Jul 2012 - 2:28 PM
    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39075 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:38 PM
    0


    Quote: Then when the photo is viewed it's magnified.

    Exactly the point I am making Pete. It's the end result that matters.

    Thanks. Smile

    Philh04
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:45 PM
    0


    Quote: Then when the photo is viewed it's magnified.

    Exactly the point I am making Pete. It's the end result that matters.

    Thanks. Smile

    But we were talking about sensors, I have to work to specific magnifications so obviously the magnification on the sensor has little relationship to the final file I produce.... In reality when using a smaller sensor you will be further away to get the same framing anyway......Tongue

    Coffee time then see if I can get home through the Olympic crowds....

    Last Modified By Philh04 at 27 Jul 2012 - 2:47 PM
    Pete
    Pete (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    12
    18230 forum postsPete vcard ePz Advertiser England95 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:47 PM
    0

    not how I read it CB...


    Quote: so you would agree that a macro lens which, at closest focus, provides a life-size image on FF will produce double life size on a 2.0 crop sensor?

    you could take the shot on the left of my illo and magnify it by using the cameras LCD zoom magnification feature, or print out with a crop. The fact is the lens isn't magnifying the image - it's as a result of the cropped sensor.
    Other wise you could say any lens will produce 4:1 ultra macro shots....and just crop them dramatically.

    mikehit
    mikehit (e2 Member)
    3
    4609 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom5 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 2:48 PM
    0

    Which is exactly the same as taking a picture with 'full frame' and cropping it 50%. But with the MFT the camera saves you the job of cropping.

    In fact what is more important than sensor size is pixel quality and noise as to whether the image is more presentable.

    Carabosse
    Carabosse (e2 Member)
    10
    39075 forum postsCarabosse vcard England269 Constructive Critique Points
    27 Jul 2012 - 3:00 PM
    0


    Quote: Which is exactly the same as taking a picture with 'full frame' and cropping it 50%. But with the MFT the camera saves you the job of cropping.

    In fact what is more important than sensor size is pixel quality and noise as to whether the image is more presentable.

    There is an old article on the Bob Atkins site which demonstrates why cropping a FF image does not always produce as good a result as capturing a larger image on the sensor in the first place. All depends on comparative number of pixels, as between 'FF cropped' and the cropped sensor, and the quality of the technology, of course.

    tomcat
    tomcat (e2 Member)
    7
    5492 forum poststomcat vcard United Kingdom8 Constructive Critique Points
    29 Jul 2012 - 8:53 PM
    0


    Quote: There is an old article on the Bob Atkins site which demonstrates why cropping a FF image does not always produce as good a result as capturing a larger image on the sensor in the first place

    I have watched this thread without commenting until now, but you are spot on CB

    It is either a macro or it is notWink

    Ade_Osman
    Ade_Osman (e2 Member)
    10
    3928 forum postsAde_Osman vcard England31 Constructive Critique Points
    30 Jul 2012 - 1:22 AM
    0


    Quote: Seems Ade's thread has been a little highjacked...

    C'est la vie guys, I'm learning stuff here, so it matters not........Nothing wrong with some healthy debate! Just for a change it's about something photographic Grin

    Ade

    [quote]I knew all this all the time Wink My 10 year old 90mm Tamron shows 1:1 on the distance scale, so on my D7000 I will get 1:1.5

    No.... No.... No.... It will be 1:1, a crop sensor does not magically increase the magnification.....

    Ok Follow this logic:

    My Tamron is set at 1:1. I have focused on a steel rule graduated in millimetres. With an FX camera the steel rule will be size for size, presumably registering 36 mm graduations across its sensor width. With a DX camera you will only get ~24 mm graduations across the sensor width. Therefore a DX camera gives an enlargement ratio of 36/24 or 1.5.

    BTW I never mentioned magnification, but enlargement ratio.

    I am happy to hear contradictory logic.

    mikehit
    mikehit (e2 Member)
    3
    4609 forum postsmikehit vcard United Kingdom5 Constructive Critique Points
    31 Jul 2012 - 6:21 PM
    0

    Pete's photos of the bee says it better than any words. It shows why people mean different things about 'magnification'.
    By the way, the image bottom right is what someone will also see in their viewfinder which only reinforces their (IMO technically incorrect) view that APS-C sensors 'magnify the image'.

    First · Prev | 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.