Join Now
Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Is this generally a 'no no' when it comes to portraits? I almost exclusively use one light on the model and bring a reflector in when I think a bit of fill is needed. This produces a second catchlight in the eyes, and sometimes I think it suits the shot whereas sometimes I find it a distraction. I suppose it depends where on the eye it appears...Anyway, I know it's all subjective but I was wondering if there was an unwritten rule that says that 'more than one catchlight is a sign of a crap photographer'...![]()
Cheers,
Geraint
P.S. I find it less of a problem outside in natural light, as the catchlights are less pronounced, so a reflector acts as sort of the main catchlight with the sky/other reflections also contributing.
P.P.S I should mention that I generally use a square softbox with gaffer tape stuck on the corners to mimick an octagon shape to make the catchlights more natural...
Hoffy suggested to get rid of one of them on HERE...
it was snowing outside and the catchlights were caused by snow on the ground , then garden fence, then a bright sky. For this shot I left both in.
I suppose with studio work you have more control but using window light you could have some quite messy catch lights and would need to get rid of some.
Catchlights make or break a portrait I think less is more in this case but looking at fashion shots you often see more than one and it tends to be done well, the one that gets on my nerve is the old light over both shoulders flash set up that you used to see in many high st photographers, this one definitely looks amateurish and please don't pay to much notice of the old camera club judges some of them really do need to look again at how studio lighting is used.
I had a shot of my daughter with 2 catchlights, but many comments critique that i should delete one and keep one.
Catchlights can enhance a portrait or they can be a distraction.
If it's the former, leave them alone, if it's the latter then reduce the size and/or intensity of the offending lights, or remove the distracting lights if you have multiples, but the only judge you should believe is yourself!
HTH.
No portrait would ever leave our studio with more than one catchlight in each eye, but this is probably old fashioned thinking!
It is, just look at the very best the photo and video industry has to offer, ie Ads on TV and Pop videos using the latest technology. time to move forward into the 21st century, rules are for breaking.
Would be nice to see some of your professional work in your portfolio.
Quote: rules are for breaking
i would have thought only if it produces something worth looking at.
i saw a portrait last night with 5 catchlights in each eye, what the hell is that all about, there was only one sun last time i looked and i thought the whole objective was to recreate natural light and shadow.
there is something slightly unnatural about a woman with two white umbrellas in each eye in my opinion. ![]()
Phil
Add a Comment
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.


















