Login or Join Now

Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more

Username:
Password:
Remember Me

Can't Access your Account?

New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!

0

Negative Scanners

Forums > Digital imaging > Negative Scanners

Join Now

Join ePHOTOzine, the friendliest photography community.

Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!

Leave a Comment
    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last
    geoff hanson
    10 Dec 2001 - 2:47 PM
    0

    I am a relative newcomer to digital imaging after many years of film based photography and am now set up from the computer and printer side to venture into negative scanning. I will be printing up to A3+ and wish to know what would be the minimum dpi scanner to give good results off full frame 35mm. Any comments on available units would be appreciated.

    Sponsored Links
    Sponsored Links
    10 Dec 2001 - 2:47 PM

    Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.

    Pete
    Pete (ePHOTOzine Staff)
    12
    18257 forum postsPete vcard ePz Advertiser England95 Constructive Critique Points
    13 Dec 2001 - 5:53 PM
    0

    This is dependent on the output resolution that you need. If you want 300ppi for a Magazine quality repro scan you will need a scanner that has at least 4800dpi optical resolution. If you are outputting on inkjet you can use a 3840dpi resolution model.

    glenside
    24 Dec 2001 - 2:35 PM
    0

    You will need one of the 4000 dpi scanners the better ones being over 1,000, $ 1,500. The file size will be circa 50 to 60 Meg. So anything less than a 800 Mhz PC or 400 Mhz Mac with around 500 Meg of Ram is hard work

    Eddie

    Little Jo
    Little Jo (e2 Member)
    11
    2271 forum postsLittle Jo vcard United Kingdom
    4 Jan 2002 - 7:44 PM
    0

    If you don't want to spend an absolute fortune, the new CanoScan FS4000US is great. I have used this and printed out to A3, it's brilliant.

    You do need lots of memory though, and a fast processor if you don't want to wait for ages for the scans to complete.

    The CanoScan costs a shade under 700 here in the UK, it's easy to use and gives great results.

    peterjones
    peterjones (e2 Member)
    11
    3493 forum postspeterjones vcard United Kingdom1 Constructive Critique Points
    3 Feb 2002 - 8:25 PM
    0

    I agree with Little Jo that the new Canon Scanner is a brilliant bit of kit, I also agree that you need a beast of a PC or Mac to handle the files; I scan in at 4000 dpi and get files up to 60mgs. It is great fun then to start using layers with those files in Photoshop or whatever, it really tests the RAM !!

    fullerton
    5 Feb 2002 - 1:44 PM
    0

    i would also like to sing the praises of the canoscan4000. it is a god. I'm getting files over 100 meg which can take a while to fiddle about with on occasion, but the short wait is worth the quality, i am stunned by it.

    First · Prev | 1 | Next · Last

    Add a Comment

    You must be a member to leave a comment

    Username:
    Password:
    Remember me:
    Un-tick this box if you want to login each time you visit.