Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Hi been wanting to scan my old negatives and turn them into digital, seen some rather cheap scanners that do this but am wondering about the quaility of the scans?
Any advice would be greatly welcomed
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Would a light box and a macro lens give you good enough quality ?
thought of that , may give it a try , but using these dedicated scanners seems easier as they d/load straight to comp, thanks for the suggestion.
I have used both methods. Scanning with a flatbed film/slide scnner, although ti does four at a time is slow. Using a base board and photographing slides (3.5 inch) was much faster (and not possible with the scanner). I used a Panasonic FZ10 at Macro with a 1 dioptre supplementary lens, focus distance was very short.
I have used a 5D and a lightbox for quarter plate and larger, glass and film. That works pretty well. I have not made a careful test comparison with a flatbed, but as the results were good I suppose didn't feel the need.
I have not tried smaller sizes, I've only scanned them.
The idea of doing a macro job on them might be worthwhile. For 35mm, I have only used a 35mm scanner, but there are some odd old film sizes that don't fit that, and don't fit very well on a flat bed scanner either - I might try taping them flat on the lightbox, and see how that goes.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
1st March 2014 - 31st March 2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View March's Photo Month Calendar