Upload your photos, chat, win prizes and much more
Can't Access your Account?
New to ePHOTOzine? Join ePHOTOzine for free!
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more for free!
Sorry folks, have to pick your brains AGAIN.
Recently, I have enjoyed taking birds in action. At least, I have tried.
I find this quite difficult with MF at times and was thinking of getting the said lens as it seems to be good at tracking moving objects.. never tried this before. I have taken all my car racing shots etc with a manual lens but then cars are more predictable than birds, who tend to fly off quite erratically
As we got breeding kestrels behind the house I would like to have a go at them but never seem to be fast enough with my big monster (600 5.6 MF)
Camera is a D3x. Does the above lens make sense? It is available @ 3200 GBP or 3700 euro. That is a lot of money but then I might sell my 500 f4 as I got the 600 f 5.6
Join ePHOTOzine for free and remove these adverts.
Hi, this may be of assistance, wish I could afford such class glass.
The price seems reasonable as the Mk II version is about £4700 new http://www.camerapricebuster.co.uk/prod.php?n=NikonAF-S200-400mmf4GEDVRIILens&am...
The 200-400 f4 which I own has decent autofocus tracking speed but is not as fast as my faster aperture 300mm f2.8.
The 200-400 with its zoom versatility is in my opinion a very good lens to own.
I am a Nikon user with a D3 & D4, I too wanted a fast lens for Natural History shots and decided on the 400 f/2.8. One of the reasons was the ability to include Tele converters without losing too much light. I am aware of the cost gap between the two, however with your 500 & 600 you are already used to the cost of such glass.
Thank you Burnsie... my 500 is for sale at £2000 it is the last MF so is my 600 which is NOT for sale
the reason I'm not too keen on the 400 2.8 is the weight. I can manage to carry my 600 for hours and shoot by hand, tried the 5 kg 2.8 'monster' once and I'm just not strong enough to hold it for long.
Hence I am thinking very seriously of the zoom
Len, did you use yours for birds?
I agree the weigh is not for hand holding however with a gimbal head circa £250 it is a breeze.
Have you considered the 70-200 f/2.8 with a 2xs TC
Burnsie, I have got an 80-200 2.8. I love it, it is my most used lens for everything but birds . you are right about the Gimbal very good if you want a stationary use. Not very good if you are walking up a mountain in Malaysia though( d3x, 24-70,80-200,200 micro nikkor , 600mm bird lens... and water! I'll let you add it up) yes I am a wimp.
I was thinking more of using a 1.4 converter with the 200-400 if needed. I need it even with the 600mm at times! But yes, I should try the 400 again. Maybe the second time I'll do better.
ePHOTOzine, the web's friendliest photography community.
Upload photos, chat with photographers, win prizes and much more.
You must be a member to leave a comment
Get the latest photography news straight from ePHOTOzine in your email every month and win prizes!
01/09/2014 - 30/09/2014
Check out ePHOTOzine's inspirational photo month calendar! Each day click on a window to unveil new photography tips, treats and techniques.
View September's Photo Month Calendar